User talk:Sethant/Archive:2012-Summer

Non-free rationale for File:RockyMountainCollegianSep2007.png

Thanks for uploading or contributing to File:RockyMountainCollegianSep2007.png. I notice the file page specifies that the file is being used under non-free content criteria, but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia is acceptable. Please go to the file description page, and edit it to include a non-free rationale.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:58, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lake Michigan–Huron

The article Lake Michigan–Huron has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:FRINGE-ish article laden with weasel words. There's a reason it's "almost universally considered to be two seperate lakes". Lake Pontchartrain is hydraulically connected to the Gulf of Mexico but we don't have a WP:SYNTH-based article claiming they're a single body of water.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:36, 9 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]