User talk:Servesnod

Please stop the garbage edits. Thank you. Jweiss11 (talk) 01:38, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

July 2011

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Eagles 24/7 (C) 01:53, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Servesnod (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was never given a warning, simply a comment about garbage edits, and I return overnight to find out that I've been indefblocked? and I cant even get a fresh start? I dont mean to be offensive, I understand that I was blocked as a vandalism only account, but I am new here, and I decided to get tricky with some links. I now relize what I did was very wrong and wasted peoples time here on wikipedia, as well as my own time. So please appeal

Decline reason:

(1) Yes you were given a warning. (2) When an account clearly exists for nothing except vandalism a lot of warning is not necessary. (3) "I decided to get tricky with some links" seems to mean "I decided to make a complete nuisance of myself by making stupid vandalistic edits". (4) It doesn't seem to me that you are "new here". JamesBWatson (talk) 13:18, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Servesnod (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(1) What warning? (2) Ok, I understand that now. (3) I know they were stupid vandalistic edits now, and I apologize, but it was only four edits, I didnt know that could get you indef blocked. (4) How so?

Decline reason:

It doesn't seem that you are here to improve the encyclopedia and I see no evidence that unblocking you would be a benefit to the project. —DoRD (talk) 14:28, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

(1) "Please stop the garbage edits" may be a rather minimal warning, but it is a warning.

(3) Well, what other editing do you plan to do? If you can persuade me that you are serious about making constructive contributions I will be willing to consider the possibility of an unblock.

(4) See WP:BEANS. JamesBWatson (talk) 16:53, 28 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Servesnod (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

(3) recent changes I recentley found unique. (4) Honestley, I dont see how WP:BEANS shows that i'm a new editor or not, but i'll take your word for it. Once again I am sorry about the link vandalism. I relize that it was a dumb idea now.

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 03:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sorry, I thought that my reference to WP:BEANS would be comprehensible to anyone who followed the link, but since I was mistaken I will explain it. WP:BEANS doesn't show why you don't seem to be a new editor, but it explains why I am not explaining how I can tell that you aren't. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:55, 29 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]