User talk:SergioR3318

Welcome

Hello, I'm STATZET. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Cenk Uygur, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. STATZET (talk) 20:22, 20 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Friday the 13th Part VIII: Jason Takes Manhattan. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 03:09, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Suicide Squad (film), you may be blocked from editing. GoneIn60 (talk) 08:08, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Top Gun: Maverick. Kpddg ^(talk) 10:19, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Tulsi Gabbard 2020 presidential campaign.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Dave Rubin. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nelsonblaha (talk • contribs) 03:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hello, I'm InfiniteNexus. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Suicide Squad (film), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. InfiniteNexus (talk) 16:43, 16 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Miner Editor. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kim Kardashian—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Miner Editor (talk) 07:37, 11 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding content to Wikipedia that is not supported by sources, like you have been doing repeatedly at Resident Evil: Apocalypse. Damien Linnane (talk) 07:47, 21 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Jason Friedberg and Aaron Seltzer, you may be blocked from editing. — Manti core 08:49, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Those projects were announced in 2014 and 2017 and there’s been no update since. It’s not a stretch to think that the projects were cancelled. Also doesn’t it say on this page that these 2 douchebags retired? SergioR3318 (talk) 07:54, 15 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

June 2023

Hi SergioR3318! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of The Fast and the Furious (2001 film) several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:The Fast and the Furious (2001 film), please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:17, 8 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Cornel West

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Cornel West, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 08:45, 16 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

This edit, rightfully reverted by SchroCat--after all the warnings you have received for unsourced edits this really shouldn't have happened. You sourced content in a BLP to a bunch of YouTube videos: that's a no-no, of course. If you are considering asking for an explanation, I urge you to wait, since WP:CIR is right around the corner--rather, you should have another look at our sourcing guidelines and the WP:BLP. Drmies (talk) 13:37, 2 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

July 2023

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Spider-Man: Across the Spider-Verse. Orange Suede Sofa (talk) 04:17, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 01:29, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Could I be unblocked indefinitely. I admit there have been times where I lacked sources but I never intended to lie about information. While mistakes have been made, I have made plenty of permanent edits that have improved Wikipedia articles before and will continue to do so if blocking is overturned. More good has come out of my editing than bad. Please consider unblocking me. Thank you. SergioR3318 (talk) 09:22, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock

Hi there. I would like to be unblocked from editing Wikipedia. While I have admittedly lacked sources on some articles, that won’t happen again. I have added tons of great and new information to many articles that have remained permanent. I’d like to be unblocked. SergioR3318 (talk) 09:20, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Follow the guidelines for placing an unblock request. They're in the blocking template. Plus, you got a talk page full of warnings; you'll have to address why you continued the troubling behavior after being warned so many times. Drmies (talk) 15:26, 10 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Hi there. I would like the block to be lifted. It has been over a year and I have learned my lesson. Many of my edits have been kept permanent on several Wikipedia articles to his day. I am not seeking to further an agenda. From now on, my sources will be much better. Please unblock me. SergioR3318 (talk) 02:16, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock 2024

Hi there. I have learned my lesson and I admit to many wrong doings. I promise my edits will have better sources. I would like to be unblocked please. SergioR3318 (talk) 02:33, 3 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]