User talk:Serendipodous/archive 30

Ti'iti'i and Maui

Hi. I've procedurally closed your RfD nomination at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2017 February 7#Maui (Samoan mythology) as what you appear to be requesting is the move of Ti'iti'i to Maui (Samoan mythology). This is generally beyond the scope of RfD. You're welcome to start a requested move, see WP:RM#CM. Noting that your rationale makes sense given the current content of the article, but this used to be very different prior to this edit from 2015. Le me know if I got anything wrong. Cheers! – Uanfala (talk) 02:24, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Millenia and years from now

Hey Serendipodous!

I didn't realize there was one table that included pre 12,000 CE years (astronomical events). All the other tables seem to start at 12,000 (12,017) if one were to take the label "Ten thousand years from now" at face value. In any case -- it's cool that there is a page that coalesces far future events like this. I was thinking about maybe starting a "Futurist Club" in my area for occasional coffee / meetups.

On using Wiki (was just reading your user profile): I agree -- if there was a local mentoring/Wiki group I would attend, as I have made some minor edits here and there, but have always had the intention of getting in deeper, mastering the formatting codes/markup, and be able to participate in some of the moderation. I frequently try to convince people on the value of having an account, and contributing occasionally / at least becoming familiar with some of the basic fundamentals of how Wikipedia works (there are so many misconceptions of what "notability" requires, accuracy and reliability and so many other topics.)

Cheers,

Jerome Jeromewiley (talk) 20:40, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your feedback matters: Final reminder to take the global Wikimedia survey

Hello! This is a final reminder that the Wikimedia Foundation survey will close on 28 February, 2017 (23:59 UTC). The survey is available in various languages and will take between 20 and 40 minutes. Take the survey now.

If you already took the survey - thank you! We won't bother you again.

About this survey: You can find more information about this project here or you can read the frequently asked questions. This survey is hosted by a third-party service and governed by this privacy statement. If you need additional help, or if you wish to opt-out of future communications about this survey, send an email through EmailUser function to User:EGalvez (WMF) or surveys@wikimedia.org. About the Wikimedia Foundation: The Wikimedia Foundation supports you by working on the software and technology to keep the sites fast, secure, and accessible, as well as supports Wikimedia programs and initiatives to expand access and support free knowledge globally. Thank you! --EGalvez (WMF) (talk) 08:25, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uranus#Edit proposals

Hello
Just to let you know I've finally got round to adding those links. (The Firefly link is a nice touch, BTW) Regards, Moonraker12 (talk) 17:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Gliese 710 in the far future

With the new Gaia data, Gliese 710 will be passing much closer than 1 LY to the Sun. I can't remember the source for this information, but I would urge you to find it is it's more important to be accurate than to keep things consistent. 2605:E000:141B:18D:6CBA:635D:8171:D165 (talk) 16:25, 3 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Top 25

You might have seen it in the project talk, but I did the report that was missing. Any rewrites, or contributing an intro text, is welcome! igordebraga ≠ 05:14, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kuiper belt scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Kuiper belt article has been scheduled to be rerun as today's featured article for May 12, 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/May 12, 2017, but note that a coordinator will trim the lead to around 1100 characters anyway, so you aren't obliged to do so. Thanks! Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:56, 27 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats on the TFA! :-) [From the user who used to be Ling.Nut]. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 02:17, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- I'm still here, for now. For now at least, trying carry a project through to completion. After that, not sure I have much reason to hang around. We'll see. Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 05:02, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Joining the choir of praise for the article. Lingzhi, if see no purpose, you might work on my red links (one a day) or Precious praise (one a day), or review my latest FAC ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:18, 12 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Top 25 report

I've finished up my Top 25 draft for the May 7-13 week, so if there's any errors, feel free to let me know or even correct them. But other than that, I think it should be ready to go. Thanks again for letting me participate in the report. Cheers :) Soulbust (talk) 21:12, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the kind words & sorry to hear about the cat; sleep is definitely deserved here, so sleep well. Soulbust (talk) 22:38, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Cut-and-paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give 3500 (song) a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Ppp ery 18:55, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jupiter trojan scheduled for TFA

This is to let you know that the Jupiter trojan article has been scheduled as today's featured article for 5 June 2017. Please check the article needs no amendments. If you're interested in editing the main page text, you're welcome to do so at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/June 5, 2017. Thanks! Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 14:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Precious five years!

--Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:11, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your part in the Jupiter trojan, shining today! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 05:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Six years now! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:05, 28 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of stories set in a future now past

Sorry about that! In my enthusiasm / carelessness, I didn't notice the alphabetical ordering of the previous entries. I'm in the process of reordering my additions now. GusF (talk) 14:01, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Herschel family

Hi, I'm Boleyn. Serendipodous, thanks for creating Herschel family!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This has been tagged for 3 issues.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Boleyn (talk) 10:41, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

An essay and a book

The Planet That Wasn't. I can't remember who else we were talking to about that. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 19:49, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was there. Some of those old 1950s-70s paperbacks with "cool" space-related covers can go for decent money on Ebay. Edwardx (talk) 09:14, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Serendipodous. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your signature

Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font> tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.

You are encouraged to change

<b>[[User:Serendipodous|<font color="#00b">Serendi</font>]][[Special:Contributions/Serendipodous|<sup><font color="#b00">pod</font></sup>]]<font color="#00b">[[User talk: Serendipodous|ous]]</font></b>

: Serendi ^pod ous

to

<b>[[User:Serendipodous|<span style="color: #00b;">Serendi</span>]][[Special:Contributions/Serendipodous|<sup><span style="color: #b00;">pod</span></sup>]]<span style="color: #00b;">[[User talk: Serendipodous|ous]]</span></b>

: Serendi ^podous

Respectfully, Anomalocaris (talk) 10:41, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Anomalocaris: That can be shortened:

[[User:Serendipodous|<b style="color:#00b">Serendi</b>]][[Special:Contributions/Serendipodous|<sup><b style="color:#b00">pod</b></sup>]][[User talk: Serendipodous|<b style="color:#00b">ous</b>]]

: Serendi^pod ous
--Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 00:51, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64: I know. But the signature is not identical. The underline is thinner. Maybe this user wants that, maybe not. I try to come up with a string that generates an identical signature. —Anomalocaris (talk) 01:13, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For me, the underlines for all three sig versions are the same thickness; it might be one of those things that varies between browsers - I use Opera 36. But the two newer sig versions have underline colours which are different from the original, although the same as each other. The only way I know of making them the same as before is to use a declaration like text-decoration:inherit; in the style= attributes, as I do in my signature - but even the effect of that varies between browsers.

Serendipodous - will you be in the pub tomorrow? Can discuss there if you like. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 11:30, 9 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64: My OS is Windows 7. My usual browser is Mozilla Firefox and my usual skin is MonoBook. I checked Chrome, Explorer, and Firefox with all six skins, comparing 3 types of links:

normal: [[User:Anomalocaris|Anomalocaris]] / [http://www.care.org Care] : Anomalocaris / Care
externally-bolded: '''[[User:Anomalocaris|Anomalocaris]]''' / '''[http://www.care.org Care]''': Anomalocaris / Care
internally-bolded: [[User:Anomalocaris|'''Anomalocaris''']] / [http://www.care.org '''Care'''] : Anomalocaris / Care

The results are:

For any combination of browser and skin, Wikilinks and external links are underlined the same.
For skin=MinervaNeue, links are not underlined except when moused over. When moused over:
- Chrome displays all 3 underlines thick.
- Explorer displays the normal links underline thin and the two bolded links underline thick.
- Firefox displays the normal and internally bolded links underlined thin and the externally-bolded links underlined thick.
For skin!=MinervaNeue, links are underlined regardless of mouseover.
- Firefox displays the normal and internally bolded links underlined thin and the externally-bolded links underlined thick.
- Chrome and Explorer display link underlines thin regardless of bolding.

Now we know. —Anomalocaris (talk) 08:41, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Serendipodous — Thanks for fixing your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 20:51, 13 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of stories set in a future now past, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Space travel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:40, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Merry Christmas and All That

Merry Christmas, Happy Holidays, and best wishes in all things! Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 11:32, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Happy holidays

I'm having a merry Christmas and I hope you have a good day today and a happy new year. Thanks for working with me over the past year on the Top 25 Report. Keep up the good work. SchreiberBike | ⌨ 23:02, 25 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 1

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Timeline of the 21st century, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Great Mosque of al-Nuri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for January 12

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Places in The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Trillian (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
	For editing and writing at Wikipedia for many years. Fotaun (talk) 22:22, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there and greetings! Cheers Fotaun (talk) 22:24, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Courses Modules are being deprecated

Hello,

Your account is currently configured with an education program flag. This system (the Courses system) is being deprecated. As such, your account will soon be updated to remove these no longer supported flags. For details on the changes, and how to migrate to using the replacement system (the Programs and Events Dashboard) please see Wikipedia:Education noticeboard/Archive 18#NOTICE: EducationProgram extension is being deprecated.

Thank you! Sent by: xaosflux 20:28, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 19

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Rhinocerotoidea, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Superfamily (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:17, 19 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

New York accent

What did you not like about what I did? How is it "a mess"? You also reverted other edits besides the merge, I hope you realize. Wolfdog (talk) 23:39, 25 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost

Hi. The Signpost has now been published after a long delay. There are some articles in it that may interest you particularly. Don't hesitate to contribute to the comments sections. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:58, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Natural satellites list

I'm not entirely sure what you intended to do with your edits... Could you explain to me what you're doing? My edit included a list of minor planet moons for easy reference, although those were removed when your edit only talked about dwarf planets. I can agree that including unproven objects like 2007 OR10 is premature, but it seems that the other listing was caught up in your edit. exoplanetaryscience (talk) 22:33, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

2010

Hi. The close of 2010 (which was analyzed, looking at the closer's contributions, in well under one minute) seems ripe for a move review. Some of the oppose comments were based on WP:SUBTITLE, which the closer may not have understood was inaccurate and irrelevant to this RM. The concept that Wikipedia would name this prominent film by its promotional title doesn't seem encyclopedic to me, and I doubt that it's the most common name for the film. Anyway, a very good nomination candidate, and thank you for bringing up the obvious flaw in the present name. If you do a move review I'll be there to add my "involved" comment. Randy Kryn (talk) 09:47, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of List of radioactive isotopes by half-life

The article List of radioactive isotopes by half-life has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Incomplete list that duplicates List of nuclides as well as the individual lists of isotopes by element

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. –LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 16:40, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for reverting the edits made to the Top 25 Report. I have dropped a note on WWGB's talk page, so hopefully that resolves things. Stormy clouds (talk) 11:48, 5 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Miranda elsinorinverness.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Miranda elsinorinverness.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:15, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Mirandaanicy.jpg

~~Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:~~

~~File:Mirandaanicy.jpg~~

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 13:23, 14 September 2018 (UTC) [reply]

Don't forget about the image in the notifcation above this one:) ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:08, 14 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Miranda elsinorinverness.jpg

Thanks for your upload to Wikipedia:

File:Miranda elsinorinverness.jpg

You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the image because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact Web page where you found the image, rather than only giving the source domain, search engine, pinboard, aggregator, or the URL of the image file itself. Please update the image description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page or me at my talk page. Thank you. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:08, 18 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

List of commonly used taxonomic affixes

Dear Serendipodous, I have made some changes to List of commonly used taxonomic affixes. As you have contributed extensively to this list (and will probably do in the (near) future), I have some questions/remarks. In some words, multiple diacritics are used within one word, e.g. άκάνθά, κέράs, άρχάίος, or Latin genitive cases are presented written in Greek letters, like γίγας, γίγαντίς, or diacritical marks are missing, like βροντη, άρχος, or put on the wrong letters, like βράχυς, βράχιων, or long and short vowels are confused, like στωμά, θερ. It seems that something went wrong. Maybe you can shed some light on your modus operandi. Thank you in advance, with kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 22:59, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Serendipodous. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]