User talk:Ser Amantio di Nicolao/Archive 2

Michael Cardew

I've added categories to this but can't seem to work out the ISBN link? Teapotgeorge 19:37, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

TWN

No harm, no foul. Thanks for the advice.

Third World Network

I see that you are the admin that pegged our entry for deletion. I just wanted to let you know we are currently working hard to fix the entry and to insure it meets any and all criteria for Wikipedia entries. And I ask that you do not delete it until we have done so and you can confirm it meets the criteria. Thank you. (SCM9 03:27, 18 December 2006 (UTC))[reply]

VFCC

Thanks for that I didn't even notice the misspelling.

—The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mjangle (talk • contribs) 00:59, 6 December 2006 (UTC).[reply]

museum

Thank you for the tips, man, but I didn't understand... Could you explain better what to do with the article Museu Paulista?

bye Mauricio Kanno 01:25, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, man, i've done some edits... what you think now?

Mauricio Kanno 01:41, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, man, thank very much!!! I'm really a novice in Wikipedia, both en and pt. I've just begun, this weekend!!! At first, it's a bit difficult, but everyone wants to help, and people help here so fast, then I think I'll learn very, very fast!!! I'm very happy to be in Wikipedia!!!

bye Mauricio Kanno 01:59, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Remember that any work whether a composition or poem or whatever can be categorised on the year as Category:1951 works Ernst Stavro Blofeld 19:00, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 5 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Tingmissartoq, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 00:06, 5 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On November 8, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Melor, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Great work again! Blnguyen (bananabucket) 03:02, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You saw the comments I left on some of your suggestions right? Blnguyen (bananabucket) 02:09, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On November 10, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Mother Featherlegs, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 07:04, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

FootballMercato

--Deni smailbegovic 02:53, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Please check our arguments in the talk section of that page (relatively important number of visitors from many countries, French version of the article approved). I hope that you'll remove your request, especially because of the fact that this service seems to be useful to many people.[reply]

DYK

On 10 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Maria Yakunchikova, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 22:35, 10 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On November 13, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Greek Slave, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

you have top billing this time. Well done. Blnguyen (bananabucket) 04:45, 13 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On November 14, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Wolf Huber, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Blnguyen (bananabucket) 06:44, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

On 16 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Varmint of Burke's Garden , which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Allen3 ^talk 02:29, 16 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion tags

From Why did the pallmer raids apper to violate citezens' rights?

No problem with the actual speedy deletion of this article, but there was actually plenty of context here. Had we not already had Palmer Raids an article like would have been a good way to discover that gap. Then a little cleanup with a few refernces and a short note on the original author's talk page would have also shown a neophyte the way to write a proper article. If you're keen, you could also create Pallmer raid, Pallmer raids, and Palmer raid as redirects. (IPs can't make pages.)
152.91.9.144 00:36, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did You Know?

On 21 November, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Minnie Evans, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 06:33, 21 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Where house

Hi there; although I have absolutely no argument about your assessment of this article for deletion, notability is, at present, not a wiki criterion for {{speedy}}. The accepted criteria are containeds in WP:CSD. If you want to use notability, you either have just to hang a {{notability}} tag on it, which does not guarantee deletion, or else use {{prod}} with any reason you like added.--Anthony.bradbury 19:09, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the help!

Thanks for lending a hand with the nom for both Santa Caterina a Magnanapoli and Thomas Livingston! I'd've hated to see nice solid articles like those go unremarked just because I was too tired to come up with a pithy hook. :) GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 10:08, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

Did you know? was updated. On 28 November, 2006, a fact from the article Santa Caterina a Magnanapoli, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 11:54, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know? was updated. On November 29, 2006, a fact from the article Thomas Livingston, which you recently nominated, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Hello Albert and thanks for helping with this nomination. It is certainly spoiling us for choice and helping to raise the front page standards. Also, I think the comments on the suggestion page were about the article length rather than the blurb. In current circumstances, it looks at though 3kb articles are on thin ice due to the increased popularity of making nominations. Thanks, Blnguyen (bananabucket) 00:10, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:BernieSearle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BernieSearle.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 23:04, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

DYK

On 1 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Uli (design), which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

(on behalf of Sandstein) BigHaz - Schreit mich an 07:44, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know

On 1 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Testament of Freedom, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howch e ng {chat} 19:11, 1 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 3 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Frederica Naval Action, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

On 3 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Frank McEwen, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

-- tariqabjotu 00:43, 3 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

+2 DYKs

On 4 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Nicholas Mukomberanwa, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

On 4 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bantcho Bantchevsky, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 17:17, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Nice article. You mention that he spoke several languages - presumably English was one of them, right? Biruitorul 03:45, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that, as a rule, we shouldn't assume anything, but given that he spent almost 40 years in the US and moved in relatively high circles, chances are indeed nearly 100% that he spoke at least some English, so I applaud your inclusion of it. Biruitorul 07:30, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BerryBickle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BerryBickle.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 10:19, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:BerniSearle.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:BerniSearle.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 10:21, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:FathiHassan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FathiHassan.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 13:55, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image:RachidKoraïchi.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RachidKoraïchi.jpg. I notice the 'image' page specifies that the image is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed image could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this image is not replaceable, please:

Go to the image description page and edit it to add {{Replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use image by finding a freely licensed image of its subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or a similar) image under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that any fair use images which are replaceable by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. —An gr 19:57, 7 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bobo

I undeleted, as per request, that was my error—— Eagle (ask me for help) 01:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

On 9 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chris Phatswe, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 16:49, 9 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Rodger Chanda

A tag has been placed on Rodger Chanda, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dgies 08:08, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Vincenzo Tommasini

Thanks for the additions and clarifications on this. I saw a few references to his Medea on other Wikipedias, but I am not at all familiar with his work and didn't want to confuse things. Any thoughts? Jokestress 22:22, 22 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

divider

Tired Of Being Personally Attacked! What should someone do if they have been REPEATEDLY PERSONALLY ATTACKED!? Isn't PERSONALLY ATTACKING someone AGAINST Wiki policy!? This user (TAnthony) ATTACKED me TWO times! Here's the attack that the below user (TAnthony) posted! He should be reprimaned IMMEDIATELY! I highlighted his ABUSE:

ATTACK 1 by TAnthony: OMG, this guy is an idiot. Unfortunately, I think I "started" it in a way; I tagged some disambig page thing he did for speedy deletion, and then all of a sudden a few Dune articles were tagged as "unreferenced" -- and they were literally articles pulled from my recent contribs, things I'd made tiny edits on. He said it was because the articles needed references, but one he tagged was the Dune: House Corrino article, which as you probably know is one paragraph of synopsis, and the article itself is the source! I reverted the first few things he did immediately but I knew eventually the rest of the Dune posse would get in on the act. Anyway, I think he'll lose interest; it's too much to hope that he'll realize he's wrong! User:TAnthony 15:26, 20 December 2006 (UTC)

ATTACK 2 by TAnthony: This and MANY other articles have been tagged by User:Yrgh latly with nebulous reasoning. He says these pages fit into the deltion policy but he doesn't say how; he cites articles as unreliable and unsourced and yet they clearly are. It is ludicrous that discussions need to be held on dozens of pages to indulge his insane tagging. Can any idiot just tag AfDs? TAnthony 01:44, 23 December 2006 (UTC)

Since becoming a valuable Wiki editor, I've been PERSONALLY ATTACKED THREE TIMES ON WIKIPEDIA & NOTHING WAS DONE ABOUT IT! The other time was when User:Juppiter (on the Christopher Goutman history pg) called mean "asshole"! I reported Juppiter & NOTHING was done about it! Consequences!?

No one, i repeat: no one, has told me about what is being or what will be done to TAnthony! Is this the image Wiki wants to portray: Come to Wiki, edit & BE INSULTED.....REPEATEDELY!?!?!?!?!?! Yrgh 09:11, 23 December 2006 (UTC)yrgh[reply]

Merry Mount

As you obviously worked so hard on the Merry Mount entry, I thought you might want to know of a commercial recording (for possible inclusion in the piece). It was on the Mercury label, just 34 minutes of highlights, but these conducted by the composer himself, with, unfortunately, a student cast. The LP has not to my knowledge been released on CD. Fred Lane 03:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your article, Hodie, was selected for DYK!

On December 24, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Hodie, which you created. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Nishkid 64 14:29, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Bob Thompson

The article Bob Thompson has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time.

Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you can establish his notability per Wikipedia:Notability (people), then please do so and re-create the article. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:18, 24 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Opo

Hello. Concerning your contribution, Opo, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to be a direct copy from http://www.teara.govt.nz/1966/O/Opo/Opo/en. As a copyright violation, Opo appears to qualify for speedy deletion under the speedy deletion criteria. Opo has been tagged for deletion, and may have been deleted by the time you see this message. If the source is a credible one, please consider rewriting the content and citing the source.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GFDL, you can comment to that effect on Talk:Opo. If the article has already been deleted, but you have a proper release, you can reenter the content at Opo, after describing the release on the talk page. However, you may want to consider rewriting the content in your own words. Thank you, and please feel free to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Kimchi.sg 03:18, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It was not directly copy-and-pasted but some paragraphs have only slight changes in word ordering compared to the original page; these aren't sufficient to make the page different in terms of "creative input" (legally speaking). Kimchi.sg 06:35, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please check your email. Kimchi.sg 16:12, 26 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Did you know?

On 27 December, 2006, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Elizalde, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--GeeJo ^(t)⁄_(c) • 13:16, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Small world and Italian

Small world - I checked out you rarticle Elizalde earlier not knowing the writer. Then I looking throughmy archives see you name recalling your kindness in my requirmenent for a bone see some italian words then i find out you wrote that artivle. ! Do you speak italian. because I had an irtalian dictionary for christmas and am hoping to learn it . Perhaps you could help me? Ernst Stavro Blofeld 17:50, 27 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ciao! Molto buono mio amico! Understand? Ernst Stavro Blofeld 18:23, 30 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:Farecardback.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:Farecardback.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you.

Just so you know, the image was replaced on Washington Metro because I found an image of mine that can be released under a free license. It's a photo of a "Max the Metro Dog" advertisement from 2002 that says basically the same thing. SchuminWeb (Talk) 05:22, 23 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost towns

I noticed your recent work on some ghost town related articles. There is a Ghost Towns WikiProject, albeit still in its early stages and there is little on the page as of yet. I will get to that soon as I have been busy with another WikiProject, National Register of Historic Places. But in the meantime you can sign up and start working, there is a basic outline there.A mcmurray 23:30, 28 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned fair use image (Image:InsaneStuntBonus.jpg)

Thanks for uploading Image:InsaneStuntBonus.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. This is an automated message from BJBot 11:19, 29 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Germaine Lubin, was selected for DYK!

On February 2, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Germaine Lubin, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid 64 22:53, 2 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

A mcmurray 04:11, 6 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

El Fenix

You created a stub "El Fenix" on the Spanish automobile. I have created an article on "El Fenix" a popular chain of Mexican Restaurants in Texas. It is small right now, but is no longer designated as a stub and will be expanded quite a bit in the next two weeks as my sources come together. I dont know the proper procedure, but I would like for the restaurant article to come up when "El Fenix" is typed in. Is there something that can be worked out or should I just accept this is the way it is? Thank you. Jameywiki 20:33, 8 February 2007 (UTC) Albert, the page is at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/El_Fenix_Restaurant Thank you!! Jameywiki 18:08, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dives and Lazarus (ballad)

That was fast operating... Thanks! How come you saw it? (If you tell me you had it on your watchlist, I'll be rather surprised.) JoergenB 18:31, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orvietan

You're one fast Herring! Four minutes!!! Anyway, thanks, it helped. The article is categorized now. ---Sluzzelin 01:11, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I just like following the Newpages list from time to time. And it was my pleasure - I know how easy it is to let little things like categories get lost in the shuffle. Happened to me this morning, as it happens. --User:AlbertHerring ^{Io son l'orecchio e tu la bocca: parla!} 01:15, 16 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:ArndtOber.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:ArndtOber.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Iamunknown 19:23, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, Charles Irving Thornton Tombstone, was selected for DYK!

On February 20, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Charles Irving Thornton Tombstone, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid 64 23:07, 20 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 1 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Diana von Solange, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 15:47, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manhattan Opera Company

I read the article you created on the Manhattan Opera Company. You have cited only one reference. A quick Google search for the company revealed an article written by Oscar Hammerstein III that gives another view of the company. It is important to have a balanced article, rather than one that relies on a single source. Perhaps you would be willing to expand the article with additional sources? — ERcheck (talk) 01:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It would be great if you could get to it soon — before its nomination on DYK expires. Please leave a note on DYK when you've made the edits. — ERcheck (talk) 02:08, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Here is the ref:

Oscar Hammerstein III. "Oscar Hammerstein (1847-1919)". Jewish Virtual Library. Retrieved 2007-03-03.

Thanks for the update. I've moved it to next update. — ERcheck (talk) 22:45, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 4 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Milka Ternina, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--BigHaz - Schreit mich an 02:21, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 4 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Damrosch Opera Company, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--BigHaz - Schreit mich an 10:42, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

An article which you started, or significantly expanded, David Bispham, was selected for DYK!

On March 4, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article David Bispham, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thanks for your contributions! Nishkid 64 20:49, 4 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manhattan Opera Company on DYK

On 5 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Manhattan Opera Company, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

Thank you for your contributions! — ERcheck (talk) 05:03, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 6 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Embassy Gulf Service Station, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 14:05, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy Gulf Service Station

I added a note about what appears to be the church mentioned in the article as being opposite the station; since the church was built in 1928 (and it's certainly a prominent structure), the line in the article might be expanded upon. MisfitToys 21:04, 6 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 8 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Howard Theatre, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 14:34, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 8 March, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Capital Airlines Flight 20, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--Carabinieri 18:57, 8 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

New NRHP Collaboration Division

Hey, saw you were a participant in the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject. I thought I would let you know that there is a new Collaboration Division up for the project. The goal of the division is to select an article or articles for improvement to Good article standard or higher. There is a simple nomination process, which you can check out on the division subpage, to make sure each candidate for collaboration has enough interested editors. This is a good way to get a lot of articles to a quality status quickly. Please consider participating. More details can be seen at the division subpage. IvoShandor 10:59, 10 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 4 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Leopold Moczygemba, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--ALoan (Talk) 15:59, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

		The DYK Medal
		I don't think you have had one of these before, so let me thank you for your excellent DYK contributions over the past months. -- ALoan (Talk) 16:04, 4 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Woodward & Lothrop Service Warehouse

On 6 April, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Woodward & Lothrop Service Warehouse, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the "Did you know?" talk page.

--howcheng {chat} 06:10, 6 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed Methodism project

It occurred to me that there is not now a functional group dealing with articles related to Methodism. I have thus created a proposal at Wikipedia:WikiProject Council/Proposals#Methodism for a group which might deal with such content. If you are interested, please feel free to indicate as much there. Thank you. John Carter 17:34, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:CharlesThorntonTomb.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:CharlesThorntonTomb.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. MECU≈talk 00:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Electric Vehicle

Care to comment? James S. 22:52, 19 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gene Davis (painter)

Hi, Why make the image so tiny on this page? CHE 19:08, 29 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maryland lighthouses and John Donahoo

I've gone through and created/edited all but one of the Maryland lighthouse articles, including providing all those you creted with infoboxes. You might want to go through and review them.

I have a question on John Donahoo. You listed him as the builder of the Watts Island Light. I think this is a mistake in the Lighthouse Society article. The construction date of this light was 1867, which would make it a bit hard for someone who died in 1858 to have built it. The USCG list for Virginia doesn't mention him at all. The missing twelth light is accounted for by Thomas Point: Donahoo built the first of the three lights erected there. Anyway, you should check this out.

It would be a good thing to have a large map of the bay (or in sections) indicating the locations of the lights. I've been trying to come up with something based on the NOAA navigation charts but if you can thing of something better/easier to work with, by all means.... Mangoe 17:28, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've checked de Gast, and I believe you are correct. I've made corrections and created Watts Island Light accordingly. Mangoe 05:06, 23 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disaster page moves

I should inform you, as you are removing the years from a number of disaster article's titles, that they now no longer conform to the relevant naming convention, which was developed so that all such articles may be alike in title. If you disagree, I request that you bring up the matter at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Disaster management. Thanks, Speciate 06:53, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I actually disagree with the naming convention, because it make the pages harder to alphabetize, and I said so yesterday on the disaster talk page. It makes little difference because of the simplicity of redirects, but leave your opinion there too if you want. Speciate 02:40, 6 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DC Meetup notice

Greetings. There is going to be a Washington DC Wikipedia meetup on next Saturday, July 21st at 5pm in DC. Since you are listed in Category:Wikipedians_in_Virginia, I thought I'd invite you to come. I'm sorry about the short notice for the meeting. Hopefully we'll do somewhat better in that regard next time. If you can't come but want to make sure that you are informed of future meetings be sure to list yourself under "but let me know about future events", and if you don't want to get any future direct notices \(like this one\), you can list yourself under "I'm not interested in attending any others either" on the DC meetup page.--Gmaxwell 22:09, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

DYK

On 13 August, 2007, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Giuseppe Moscati, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Wizardman 02:20, 13 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia Study

Hi, thanks for your message :-)

If you would like to participate in my study I'd love to have you! I'm interviewing WP users on their thoughts regarding the WP community. The interviews are via email and are in 3 parts. As I'm now getting close to deadline we'd have to move fairly quickly :-)

If you're still interested, please send me an email and we can begin! (tamsin.lloyd@gmail.com)

Cheers, tamsin 11:38, 29 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:HowardHanson.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:HowardHanson.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in Wikipedia articles constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use. Suggestions on how to do so can be found here.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Rette tast 18:30, 14 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:TibbettBradford.jpg

I have tagged Image:TibbettBradford.jpg as {{no rationale}}, because it does not provide a fair use rationale. If you believe the image to be acceptable for fair use according to Wikipedia policy, please provide a rationale explaining as much, in accordance with the fair use rationale guideline, on the image description page. Please also consider using {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. Thank you. Rette tast 21:31, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

White House

Hi there. I am involved in a great debate about the White House here, and was wondering if you could shed some light and help us out from your point of view, being a member of Wikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic Places. Thanks, Happyme22 05:00, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Danvignes

Danvignes, an article you created, has been nominated for deletion. We appreciate your contributions. However, an editor does not feel that Danvignes satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Danvignes and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Danvignes during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Rtphokie (talk) 20:09, 26 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kenneth Laisi

I did not propose the article for AfD, but have relisted it for more discussion. Tyrenius (talk) 15:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Battle of Szkłów (1654)

You are right, I was using a template from another article which ended in Russian victory and you caught that one before I did :) Thanks, and Merry XMAS! PS. Pan in Polish in this context sounds as strange as Mister wound in English; but of course your gesture is appreciated :D --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| talk} 18:16, 24 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Little context in Willis, Grenada

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Willis, Grenada, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Willis, Grenada is very short providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Willis, Grenada, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 21:00, 29 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:FaceontheBarroomFloor.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:FaceontheBarroomFloor.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 05:20, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Mukomberanwa.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Mukomberanwa.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 18:44, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Ljungberg.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to Image:Ljungberg.jpg. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is not a suitable explanation or rationale as to why each specific use in Wikipedia constitutes fair use. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Shell ^babelfish 16:55, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Jeremy Wafer

An editor has nominated Jeremy Wafer, an article on which you have worked or that you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeremy Wafer and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 01:59, 15 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar and archiving

File:Interlingual Barnstar.png		The Geography Barnstar
		For making decent stubs about cities and settlements in Guadeloupe. Kannie \| talk 16:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

And, BTW, it's time to archive your talk page :P. --Kannie | talk 16:29, 19 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]