User talk:Sequel5

Hello, Sequel5, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Introduction

5 The five pillars of Wikipedia

How to edit a page

Help

Tips

How to write a great article

Simplified Manual of Style

Fun stuff...

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Rosiestep (talk) 23:41, 20 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Sequel5, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Sequel5! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like MrClog (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 21 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Blair Studios (May 28)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Celestina007 was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Hello could you in your spare time, read WP:NOT.

Celestina007 (talk) 21:38, 28 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Blair Studios

Hello, Sequel5. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Blair Studios, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:02, 28 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Blair Studios

Hello, Sequel5. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Blair Studios".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:38, 28 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of TIME ENCRYPTION

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on TIME ENCRYPTION requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:36, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This article has been written with reference to United States Bureau of Industry and Security website. Sequel5 (talk) 04:26, 9 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about TIME ENCRYPTION

Hello, Sequel5, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username TheTechnician27, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, TIME ENCRYPTION, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TIME ENCRYPTION.

You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|TheTechnician27}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 23:24, 11 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@TheTechnician27:

Hello, TheTechnician27! I believe the article "TIME ENCRYPTION" should not be deleted because it covers a significant topic classified by the US National Security Agency. The concept of time encryption is an important aspect of secure communication, and its classification by the NSA underscores its relevance. This article can provide valuable insights into encryption methods and their application in the realm of national security. If further improvements are needed, I'm committed to enhancing the article to meet Wikipedia's standards. Thank you for considering these points in the discussion.

Sequel5 (talk) 04:06, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Sequel5: your comments in the discussion linked above give me a distinct feeling that you may be using a Large Language Model (like ChatGPT) to generate your replies. If this is so, I would recommend that you stop this. Also, please stop replying to every comment in the discussion: this can be seen as BLUDGEONing, which is considered to be a disruptive behaviour. Thanks, Schminnte (talk • contribs) 18:26, 12 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello @Schminnte: I appreciate your feedback and will ensure that my contributions align with Wikipedia's guidelines and community norms. Sequel5 (talk) 01:30, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Schminnte: I was getting that same feeling (see their responses on the AfD discussion). TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 17:59, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Yes @TheTechnician27, that was part of my reasoning. They also sent me a email that reminded me of this case. Schminnte (talk • contribs) 18:02, 13 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you recently removed maintenance templates from TIME ENCRYPTION. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Please see Help:Maintenance template removal for further information on when maintenance templates should or should not be removed. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. —siro χ o 03:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I am in the middle of AfD discussions and defending the article against bullying and smear campaign. Sequel5 (talk) 03:08, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please, assume good faith. —siro χ o —siro χ o 03:10, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please check definition of good faith before harassing someone. Sequel5 (talk) 03:11, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not use misleading edit summaries when making changes to Wikipedia pages, as you did to TIME ENCRYPTION. This behavior is viewed as disruptive, and continuation may result in loss of editing privileges. See this edit [1] —siro χ o 03:07, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

We will see who loses privileges Sequel5 (talk) 03:09, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I guess the courteousness falls away when you stop using an LLM to generate exhaustingly long replies. TheTechnician27 (Talk page) 03:56, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It also falls away after being bullied and harassed by editors who have no life but to pin their opinions and show their power. Sequel5 (talk) 04:06, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator's noticeboard

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. —siro χ o 03:26, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

August 2023

You have been blocked from editing indefinitely for edit warring, as you did at TIME ENCRYPTION and for placing a legal threat, as you did here. Your block may be reduced if you withdraw this legal threat. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Lourdes 05:43, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sequel5 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to appeal the recent block that was imposed on my account for alleged edit warring and making a legal threat on the TIME ENCRYPTION article.

I would like to clarify that my intention was not to engage in edit warring or make any form of legal threat. There seems to be a misunderstanding regarding the situation, and I apologize if my previous actions were misconstrued.

Regarding the situation in question, it appears there was a misunderstanding with another editor who accused me of taking undisclosed payment for writing the article. In response, I may have used stronger language due to frustration, but my intention was not to make a legal threat. I understand that open communication and collaboration are essential in resolving disputes on Wikipedia, and I deeply regret any confusion that may have arisen from my actions.

I am committed to adhering to Wikipedia's guidelines and policies, and I value the importance of consensus-building and respectful communication within the editing community. I assure you that my primary goal is to contribute positively to the platform by providing accurate and well-sourced information.

I kindly request that you review my appeal and consider lifting the block on my account. I am more than willing to engage in constructive discussions, address any concerns, and learn from this experience to ensure that similar situations are avoided in the future.

Thank you for taking the time to consider my appeal. I am looking forward to the opportunity to continue contributing to Wikipedia in a positive and collaborative manner. Sequel5 (talk) 06:19, 14 August 2023 (UTC)}[reply]

Decline reason:

Request summarily declined as it was written by an AI. You are blocked, so we want to hear from you, not an AI. Please write a request in your own words. I would also suggest not using the Reply function to write a request; the Reply function is not designed to accomodate unblock requests well; please open the edit window directly by clicking "edit" at the top of this page. 331dot (talk) 08:35, 14 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please don't use Chat GPT for your requests, if you are. Kindly use your own words. Thanks, Lourdes 06:27, 14 August 2023 (UTC)a[reply]