User talk:Sephiroth storm/Archives/2009/August

Dramedy

Why don't you see that it fits into the category. Have you seen the show before? It's hilarious, but has an equal amound of serious content in it. That is why I see it fit to label this as a dramedy.

Also, as to my history of discussions, you need not worry. I learned my lesson after being temporarily banned and have now learned how to discuss in an appropriate manner.--24.40.134.221 (talk) 02:34, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Good to hear it. Whether or not I believe it fits, for inclusion, there must be Reliable sources. Sephiroth storm (talk) 11:20, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Why must there be a reliable source for just one word. Its not changing the plot of the article or any other details in it.--Red Slayer 16:22, 14 August 2009 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Valkyrie Red (talk • contribs)

Mainly because it has been disputed. The original revert indicates that there is not Consensus. CBS characterizes the show as a Action Drama, see here: [1] If you think about it, most dramas have comedy at some point, even CSI. If you would like it, indicate so on the talk page, in the section started, and provide any sources. That way it is less likely to be reverted at some point in the future. Sephiroth storm (talk) 18:53, 14 August 2009 (UTC)

Everything now A-OK

No problem. It all worked out alright in the end. I thought that perhaps the other user had reported me for vandalism after my third revert when I told him I was going to report the issue.Simonm223 (talk) 22:06, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

Nope, Thanks for the heads up, I will have to watch for that in the future. Sephiroth storm (talk) 22:07, 31 August 2009 (UTC)