User talk:SepehrAln

This is SepehrAln's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Welcome to Wikipedia (and WikiProject MBC)

Welcome...

Hello, SepehrAln, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 10:32, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I look forward to seeing you about the MCB pages. On an additional note, I can recommend this slightly more in-depth tutorial series: Help:Introduction. T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 10:32, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kingdom of The Yellow Mountain moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Kingdom of The Yellow Mountain, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 01:49, 17 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Kingdom of The Yellow Mountain concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Kingdom of The Yellow Mountain, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:28, 18 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Kingdom of The Yellow Mountain

Hello, SepehrAln. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Kingdom of The Yellow Mountain".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Lapablo (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

January 2021

Please refrain from using talk pages such as Aspartame for general discussion of the topic or other unrelated topics. They are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways, based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines; they are not for use as a forum or chat room. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. See here for more information. Your POV tag is unwarranted on this article. You have not contributed to article edits or source improvement. Basically, you did a "drive-by" drop of a tag indicating bias without first raising concerns and getting consensus on the talk page, WP:CON, or by making good faith edits in the article with new or better sources. There is no evidence of bias in the article - which has been well-edited over years, mainly based on quite old literature and regulatory assessments about aspartame safety in the typical food supply. You have the opportunity now on the talk page to engage in specific discussion about what concerns you have. Please propose text for the article and WP:MEDRS review articles to support your possible changes. You can respond here on your talk page, if you wish. Zefr (talk) 16:09, 28 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]