User talk:Seny P Arukattu

Welcome!

Hello, Seny P Arukattu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as User:Seny P Arukattu, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Drm310 (talk) 16:41, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Content requires reliably published sources that actually verify the claims made

Hello, I'm TheRedPenOfDoom. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Nandita Swetha, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 17:51, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Improperly sourced content

Hi, the content you keep trying to submit at Nandita Swetha is improperly sourced. You cannot use Wikipedia as a reference as it is user-contributed. See WP:RS. If the subject won an award, use a published source, like a web news article. This reference doesn't mention a release date for Idam Porul Yaeval, so you cannot use it to justify a 2015 release. Find a more specific source, please. I fail to see how a photoshoot is being used as a reference. What information does this support? You should find a better reference than this, again, one that is specific to the content you are supporting. Please do not resubmit this problematic content as it will be considered disruptive. And if you have any questions, please feel free to reply here; I've added your talk page to my watchlist. Thanks, Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:25, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Cyphoidbomb If the article I have sourced for Nandita Swetha is not reliable then why that article is having her name in that. Why dont you remove that article then. Example Puli (2015 film) and similary other movies too. And I have given the source of Times of India article. Times of India is a leading news paper in India. And if that cant be used as a reliable source then why all articles are showing Times of India as a reliable source. Please remove all those articles then. For example DOB of Nazriya Nazim Puli --Seny P Arukattu (talk) 18:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you're confused about. Does this reference say "the film will be released in 2015"? If not, then find another source, please. As for your other question, I have already explained it: You cannot use Wikipedia as a reference. You can go into the relevant Wikipedia article and copy an existing reference that supports your addition and paste it into the Nandita Swetha article next to your added content, but you cannot point to another Wikipedia article as a reference. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 18:43, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, and to directly address your question about Nazriya Nazim's birthdate, there are two references in the article that support that. Look under her photo next to "(age 20)" and you'll see them. The difference between that article and this one, is that you never provided a reliable source. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:28, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Seny P Arukattu (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

From last 3 days I am discussing with the experts in wiki and the changes are done according to their instructions and has given reliable sources for each and every thing. The new films were updated by someone else. What I have done is just adding the reliable source to those links. If the article in Times of India cannot be a reliable source then how the same news paper article is been the source for many of the articles in Wiki. I cant understand when some wiki officials have agreed the article then why someone else is coming and editing again. This actress Nandita Swetha is having personal harassment because of wrong DOB attacted to the article. And her new movies are already mentioned in the movie pages with her name in it. When her movie Puli article is having her name in that then why she cant add that film to her article. And similarly all other movies which is been there for long time. In wiki itself diff people are having different policies each day. I have done the edits and that was approved yesterday and suddenly today someone is removing each and every article which was updated by me. If wiki is not a reliable source then what happened to the source of Times of India, which is a reputed news paper from India and many of the articles are showing it as a reliable source. This profile is attacked by somany new editors from time to time. If She cant have proper details in wiki then kindly delete that article please. I am a known Fashion/Celebrity photographer from India and She is my friend. And she is facing issues because of this article in Wiki which is having wrong information about her

Decline reason:

The Times of India is a reliable source, however the content you're adding isn't supported by the link you're providing. PhilKnight (talk) 22:44, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

User isn't quite understanding the corrections s/he's being given. Times of India is a reliable source, but this link, which talks about the release of a Idam Porul Yaeval soundtrack is irrelevant to this content the user added (in bold):

Year	Film	Role	Language	Footnotes
2015	Idam Porul Yaeval †	Venmani	Tamil	Post-production ¹

The reference is problematic because there's nothing in it that mentions a 2015 release and there's no mention that the film is in post-production. I'm not sure what's so difficult to understand about that. I'm also not sure what the editor's complaint is about the subject's birth date—there is no birth date in the article. It was removed two days ago. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 19:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

My question is if the film article can have her name in the article which you are allowing then why the artist can't have the film name in her article. The DOB was removed 2 days ago. But the wrong DOB was there for many months. Because of which the artist was struggling. 100s of volenteers of Wiki. And each one talking different system. I edited the article in discussion with another administrator and he has agreed my edits. And today if the links are not reliable then u should have removed just the links. There was no need of removing the entire details. Especially her new movies. Those movie pages are having her name in their article. --Seny P Arukattu (talk) 19:48, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, you're confused. Idam Porul Yaeval is in the Nandita Swetha article. As for the incorrect birthdate having been in the article for so long, that may have been remedied months earlier if someone had posted a request on the article's talk page months earlier, (hard to say becaue there are fewer than 30 editors with this article on their Watchlist) or, if there was no quick response (for instance after this talk page request) posting a help request at WP:HELPDESK may have proven fruitful. But that still doesn't change the fact that any new birthdate added would have to be supported by reliable sources. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:15, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The original removal of the previous birth date was done in response to a request made to OTRS. Like the one Seny wanted to add, it was unsourced so its removal was a no-brainer. I tried to explain that, lacking a reliable secondary source for the DOB, we'd rather not have one at all. §FreeRangeFrog^croak 20:17, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2023

Hi Seny P Arukattu! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of Unni Mukundan several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:Unni Mukundan, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. ― Blaze Wolf^Talk_{Blaze Wolf#6545} 17:18, 9 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]