User talk:Sentinel R/Archive 2010

Welcome!

Hello, Sentinel R, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Doc Quintana (talk) 06:15, 15 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nigeria

Hi Sentinel R,

thank you for your article Nigerian sectarian violence. I ask you to write articles on Christian minorities in Muslim-majority states of Nigeria.

Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 17:28, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing.

"Itself do the collage" Not what you would call a 'productive' edit summary. Wikipedia is a collaborative effot, not Sentinel R & co. encyclopedia. If you have a dispute, it's better to talk it out. Also, you don't seem to be a native English speaker. Is English your second or third language? Perhaps contributing to your region-based wikipedia would prove to be more fruitful. Akkies (talk) 06:36, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"if you want to add portraits, make a collage. simple. the picture box is stretched and it looks messy". Do not specify to me what to do. You wish to make something? - Do it."Also, you don't seem to be a native English speaker. Is English your second or third language?"I don't ask you - who you on nationalities and what your native language. I don't care about it."Perhaps contributing to your region-based wikipedia would prove to be more fruitful" .Thanks for so valuable remark.Sentinel R (talk) 06:55, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Do it."

That's why I reverted your edit. If my reasons weren't clear to you (as an English speaker), then perhaps me suggesting you to edit wikis centered to languages you are proficient with is relevent in this case. Akkies (talk) 07:18, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I will not make a collage. You want to make a collage - do it YOURSELF. I'll decide what to do, you are not an administrator, and not a moderator to tell me..Sentinel R (talk) 07:38, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

A montage was a suggestion to fixing the cluttered picture box. I'm sorry, but looks horrible. You're free to do what you want, but don't expect everyone to kowtow to your edits. Anyways, I've reported you for going over 3RR. Akkies (talk) 08:45, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What prevents you to make your collage? I do not care what you think about my edits. You do better if you can.Sentinel R (talk) 09:28, 14 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

photo at Koreans

What happened to old picture set? That was way better than your new one. Only four people?--Korsentry 09:05, 15 April 2010 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by KoreanSentry (talk • contribs)

If you want, you can add to the picture of the man - whom you see best.Sentinel R (talk) 10:36, 15 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Kosovo recognition article

I have removed most of the text from talk:International recognition of Kosovo#Latin America because it was not relevant to the article, however I've left your original question and a couple of the responses that followed. I'm sorry Avala was so rude and unwelcoming to you - I think he must have got out of bed on the wrong side this morning. To be fair to Avala, your question was a bit unnecessary (because everything we know is already in the article) but there was no need for him to respond in the way that he did - I thought your question was quite normal. Having said that, you shouldn't have said his post was "like a drunken delirium" - bear in mind WP:CIVIL. Regards, Bazonka (talk) 18:28, 17 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Bazonka,you're adequate user. I did not write anything against you.Sentinel R (talk) 13:45, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I know. I don't really have a problem with anything you wrote. Regards, Bazonka (talk) 11:30, 19 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Belarusians. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. Cool it. You're way past 3RR when you consider your IP address. You need to seek discussion now. Shadowjams (talk) 08:14, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please,read the http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Belarusians#Victor_Yanukovych._Belarusian.3F.User:Ales hurko without references regularly change the article.He does not want reach a сonsensus.Sentinel R (talk) 08:40, 20 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I did provide all references, now it's your turn to prove that Yanukovich, not his father, is Belarusian. Ales Hurko (talk) 21:55, 24 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sentinel R. You have new messages at TFOWR's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

TFOWR^{This flag once was red} 13:13, 4 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sense?

Sometimes some reference notes are in single columns and are difficult to follow - try it - you can actually find things easier in mutliple columns - please do not revert format items unless you can find a good example or policy to back it up - you might like to have a closer look at WP:MOS - please note as you have a low edit count - looking at what occurs in wikipedia is both looking at policy and practice - if you try reasoning on sense alone - you will find you are going to be having problems with acceptable usage in the general construction of pages - also as you have already been involved in edit war warnings - please note you will gain more respect in the community if you look first and look for good reason for things rather than revert things Because you dont like it Satu Suro 15:28, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

After your editing - page is distorted, so I returned it back to normal view."you will gain more respect in the community if you look first and look for good reason for things rather than revert things Because you dont like it" - what are you talking about? I justified this action, look what turned page after your edits.Sentinel R (talk) 15:36, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

See how the page looks - [1]. You vandal?.Sentinel R (talk) 15:44, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fellowship of Churches of Christ in Nigeria

Hi Sentinel R,

this is an article, which I have just created. It has the problem of having a list of its members, which probably mostly have articles. There seem to have been name-changes however. I suggest you ask someone for help, as you are member of the Wiki Project Nigeria.

Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 18:24, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,Sarcelles.I'll see what can be done. Maybe I'll be able to help you. I found a mistake - [2]. What about the other red links - I found nothing. At any time you can ask help of other members of the WikiProject - [3].Regards,Sentinel R (talk) 18:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Myanmar-Bangladesh 1 week war

Hi, I've just reverted your edits to this article as the material you added doesn't seem relevant to the rest of the article's claimed content - I've explained this at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Myanmar-Bangladesh 1 week war. It appears that there's an article to be written about the maritime border dispute between the two countries, but this isn't it. Nick-D (talk) 10:14, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I've just created an article on the bilateral relationship between the two countries, including the references you identified, at Burma-Bangladesh relations Nick-D (talk) 10:49, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. No problem.Sentinel R (talk) 16:38, 23 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nigerian sectarian violence

Hi Sentinel R,

your possibly favourite article is back. Kind regards Sarcelles (talk) 16:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Excellent work,Sarcelles.How do you think should be added Military infobox for this article?Sentinel R (talk) 17:26, 27 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sentinel R,

thank you for adding the infobox. Now I have written articles on Religion in the states of Nigeria, where the Sharia is valid, such as Religion in Kano State. Kind regards, Sarcelles (talk) 17:53, 3 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

correction

The deletion at the bottom, from mid-sentence on, was indeed inadvertent. Not at all vandalism, and thanks for fixing it. Apologies. The revisions above were intentional. Check MOS, for example, as to 60 vs. sixty. And check the meaning of targeted killing -- that is not what was meant. Best.--Epeefleche (talk) 02:28, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Well it was an accident. If you make your changes without removing the categories, then I'll just behind.Sentinel R (talk) 03:08, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

No worries -- sorry for the mistake. Not sure how it happened. In general, if you are wondering about whether someone is a vandal, you might check the number of edits they have made. And if they have blocks that were not quickly lifted. Those are good clues. Cheers.--Epeefleche (talk) 06:59, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This action was correct. I am glad that you're not a vandal:)Sentinel R (talk) 08:18, 16 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]