User talk:SenorMcChum
An article you recently created, 時間, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:
" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. – AssumeGoodWraith (talk | contribs) 09:53, 12 January 2022 (UTC)
FitGirl Repacks and reliable sources
[edit]I appreciate your attempt to add more information to FitGirl Repacks, as that article is quite short and could be improved. However, I've reverted your edits as the sources you cited are not considered reliable. Wikipedia relies on reliable sources so that people can trust article content, this importantly means that user-generated content such as web forums and self-published sources such as blogs are generally unacceptable. Elli (talk | contribs) 07:59, 14 January 2022 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: 時間 (February 1)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:時間 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:時間, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello, SenorMcChum!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Wgullyn (talk) 14:50, 1 February 2022 (UTC)
|
Concern regarding Draft:Makise Kurisu
[edit]Hello, SenorMcChum. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Makise Kurisu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:02, 14 June 2022 (UTC)
Hello, SenorMcChum. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:時間, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2022 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Makise Kurisu
[edit]Hello, SenorMcChum. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Makise Kurisu".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 19:02, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nanahira until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Aasim - Herrscher of Wikis ❄️ 03:19, 16 August 2022 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
[edit]Hello, SenorMcChum
Thank you for creating Japan Cartoonists Association.
User:Netherzone, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:
Thank you for creating this article on a notable organization.
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Netherzone}}
. Please remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
.
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
Netherzone (talk) 20:45, 25 August 2022 (UTC)
Hello, SenorMcChum
Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username JML1148, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, Chokottodake, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.
If you wish to contest the deletion:
- Edit the page
- Remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- Click the button.
If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JML1148}}
. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)