User talk:Sendakite

Ex-Conism must have a founder and that happens to be me, Richard Ritchy Dubé. I want to advance social justice and begin this long overdue dialog. Who are you to say this discourse does not belong in the social sciences? It does not exist anywhere.

Carl Hewitt is right about Wikipedia not being genuinely interested in academia, but is rather a censorship board trying to control media and information. Are you pretty tyrants with a need for control?

Speedy deletion of Richard 'Ritchy' Dubé

Please see neologism and memetics

A tag has been placed on Richard 'Ritchy' Dubé requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TrulyBlue (talk) 19:50, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ex-Conism

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Ex-Conism, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Made up stuff, not notable.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. TrulyBlue (talk) 19:51, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Ex-Conism

I have nominated Ex-Conism, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ex-Conism. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Sandstein 20:04, 18 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

December 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we must insist that you assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Sandstein. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. See [1]. Sandstein 06:59, 23 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]