User talk:Semmasemma7
hi, SoWhy, 1) Please see my User:Semmasemma7/Barbara_Rosenthal page. I followed your reply. We fixed everything in the Barbara Rosenthal article so it is completely in our own words except what we've quoted exactly and we've cited those things correctly. The body was always our own words - it was only the awards and teaching lists that weren't, and that is what confused us about why u took it down but now we understand - I hope! 2) i have a few questions about the parts where thereis a long quote - that is the part about the mandates, and where we've listed quotations. Are they ok? The quotations do come from the artist's website but we found all the correct citations, and her website doesn't have them, so our quotations list is more scholarly and we'd like to keep it on Wikipedia. Also, we-and many peo9ple- have read her unpublished novel, Wish For Amnesia, and would like to put up quotes from that too-can we, if we cite it? 3) That might take us some time, tho, so could you please unprotect the page as is if you think it is ok as is. And if you unprotect it does that mean that the article will go up directly from my user page or do we have to put it up on the Barbar aRosenthal page too? Semmasemma7 (talk) 21:18, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
- As you can see, I fixed it up a bit, mostly bringing it in line with the Manual of Style. I removed the quotations as they should go to Wikiquote (and if I hadn't, the first person editing the article probably would have done so). I also removed the "terms coined"-section, as you need to provide secondary sources that prove that those terms indeed had an impact in her field of work. You can always add them back later. I moved the page to article-space now and it can be found at Barbara Rosenthal. If you edit it further, please try to keep with the style I changed it to (and other will do). Oh and never add your signature to articles (see WP:OWN). Nice work with the text :-) Regards SoWhy 21:08, 5 December 2008 (UTC)
The article Artpool Art Research Center has been proposed for deletion. The proposed-deletion notice added to the article should explain why.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Feel free to write to me for clarifications on my talk page. Wireless Fidelity Class One (talk 18:08, 11 December 2009 (UTC)