User talk:Seibun

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Seibun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 10:12, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

MOS:JP

Hello. Please see Wikipedia:Manual of Style (Japan-related articles) to learn more about the standard used by Wikipedia. The standard here is Hepburn revised: please do NOT change romanization in article, as you have been breaking links and pictures on every article you modified (especially using a nonstandard i'i instead of the regular ii): [1], [2], etc.

For instance, working links to Shakujii castle and Shakujii River become broken links after you change them to Shakuji'i castle and Shakuji'i River in error. It is worse when you changed filenames of pictures and caused them to be deleted from the system.

Please familiarize yourself with guidelines, and use the "Show changes" and "Show preview" buttons when doing an edit, so as to catch such errors before saving to the encyclopedia, thanks. 62.147.25.2 (talk) 13:19, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2010

Please do not use styles that are unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles, as you did in Kiichirō Furukawa‎. There is a Manual of Style that should be followed. Thank you. --DAJF (talk) 10:37, 23 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Page move against consensus

I have reverted your renaming of the Ecchi article. The issue has been discussed on the talk page, and the consensus seems to favor the current spelling. If you disagree, please contribute to the talk page discussion rather than attempt a unilateral page move. Favonian (talk) 18:10, 19 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Romanization

Modified Hepburn romanization (as described below) should be used in all cases, excepting those cases where another romanization is determined to be in common usage in reliable sources. Japanese terms should be romanized according to common usage in English-language reliable sources as indicated by policy, including unconventional romanization of titles and names by licensees (e.g., Devil Hunter Yohko and Tenjho Tenge—see below)—words used frequently in English (such as sumo or judo), the official English name for companies and organizations (e.g., Kodansha rather than Kōdansha, Doshisha University rather than Dōshisha University), or location names (e.g., Tokyo, Kyoto, Osaka, Kobe, Kyushu, Honshu, Hokkaido, Ryukyu Islands, Bonin Islands, Iwo Jima). The list of examples given here is not exhaustive. Redirects for all likely romanizations should be created to make sure people will be able to find the articles easily regardless of which form they use in their search. To determine if the non-macronned form is in common usage in English-language reliable sources, a review should be done of all the related reliable sources used for the article (as well as any which may not have been specifically used, but can still be considered reliable per WP:RS). This may be redetermined periodically (generally no more often than semiannually) as usage changes over time and as new additional reliable sources become available. If it can not be determined whether the non-macronned form is in common usage in English-language reliable sources, then the macronned form should be used until such time as it can be determined. If an article uses English-language reliables source and those sources use a particular form of romanization to name a topic, give preference to that romanization in the article title and body text. If an article uses only Japanese-language reliable sources, use the romanization given in them. If no romanization is given by the reliable sources used in an article, use modified Hepburn romanization. In all cases, the same romanization should be used for the article title and the body text (within that article and within the body text of other articles). Please note that scholarly reliable sources (e.g., encyclopedias, academic journals, documentaries, and textbooks) and mainstream media (e.g., newspapers, magazines, and television reports) reliable sources are equally acceptable, and neither should be considered more valid than the other. However, more recent reliable sources should generally be given preference over older reliable sources, especially in topics and areas where current understanding may be more complete than older understanding (e.g., in science and technology).Samuraiantiqueworld (talk) 16:09, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

日本庭園について

こんにちは。私は英語が書けないので日本語で失礼します。あなたが日本人であることを期待して。さて、私はJapanese gardenの記事を翻訳機械を使って読みましたが、あまりにも中国の話が極大化されていませんか？。ひとつの記事で「中国」という外国の単語が50回も出てくるのはバランスに欠いているように感じます。外国の影響を受けた文化でも、他の記事ではこのような例はありません。特に日本文化に関係する記事では、他の国の文化に関係する記事に比べて外国に関する言及が極大化されています。確かに日本は古代の庭園において中国の影響を受けたが、平安時代から日本の独自性が強くなっていき、室町時代にはかなりの独自性を獲得しています。それなのに、この記事では、江戸時代までほとんど日本庭園の独自性がなかったように感じてしまいます。お手数ですが、あなたに修正していただけるとありがたいです。--118.19.59.107 (talk) 22:26, 12 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification

Hi. When you recently edited Kanō Motonobu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sakai (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:51, 22 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited Odaiba, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Shun'ichi Suzuki (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Station romanization

I'm curious why you are hyphenating all the station names for Japanese train stations. WP:MOS-JA clearly states to avoid hyphenization in almost every instance. ···日本穣^? · 投稿 · Talk to Nihonjoe · Join WP Japan! 16:08, 23 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 22

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tōsenkyō, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tsuyu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:34, 22 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seibun. You have new messages at DAJF's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:03, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]