User talk:Seemu
References
[edit]Medical articles on Wikipedia must be cited by the best available evidence and written in a consistent format. A list of resources to help edit such articles can be found here. Additionally, the diberri tool will aid in the formatting of references; all one needs to do is cut and paste the results. The welcome page is another good place to learn about editing the encyclopedia. If you have any questions, please feel free to drop me a note. Cheers. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 17:15, 2 March 2011 (UTC)
Glad to hear and welcome
[edit]I hope the above tag was not too off putting. We have a great guideline here at WP:MEDRS that outlines what sort of sourcing we try to use on Wikipedia. If you go to pubmed and type in whatever you are looking for than hit the button on the right that says reviews pubmed will limit your search to that type of article. If you need help with access let me know. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 07:16, 3 March 2011 (UTC)
Primary sourcing of Molecular phenotyping
[edit]Further to the above by Doc James, I note (six years on) that you are still using primary sources to create articles. Please read WP:PRIMARY, you really should be familiar with our sourcing policies by now. Chiswick Chap (talk) 09:05, 8 June 2017 (UTC)
AfC notification: Draft:Tissue heterogeneity has a new comment
[edit]Your submission at Articles for creation: Tissue heterogeneity has been accepted
[edit]Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider
.Thanks again, and happy editing!
Deb (talk) 13:20, 25 October 2021 (UTC)- I've accepted this but it really needs more context for those unfamiliar with the subject. The introduction could be improved in this way. Deb (talk) 13:36, 25 October 2021 (UTC)
August 2023
[edit]Thank you for your contributions. It seems that you may have added public domain content to one or more Wikipedia articles, such as Draft:BML-275. You are welcome to import appropriate public domain content to articles, but in order to meet the Wikipedia guideline on plagiarism, such content must be fully attributed. This requires not only acknowledging the source, but acknowledging that the source is copied. There are several methods to do this described at Wikipedia:Plagiarism#Public-domain sources, including the usage of an attribution template. Please make sure that any public domain content you have already imported is fully attributed. Thank you. Nobody (talk) 10:59, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
- Thanks @1AmNobody24! I updated the item according to your suggestion. Please kindly let me know if you have more suggestions and/or questions. Best regards, Seemu (talk) Seemu (talk) 14:02, 4 August 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:BML-275
[edit]Hello, Seemu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:BML-275, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:06, 4 January 2024 (UTC)