User talk:Seeleschneider
Welcome!
[edit]
|
Hollow ability section
[edit]I appreciate your efforts to try and bring up the quality of the article, however, there's a limit on what kind of information we can add to it with regards to the fiction and notability guidelines, among others. Minor abilities such as the pesquisa, which is only mentioned and obviously used once, isn't important enough to be kept and only adds to making the article overly long and bulky. If you wish to discuss this issue and argue in favor of keeping those abilities, then you're welcome to the article's talk page where we can talk this through and reach consensus. Akke Bandvagn 15:02, 1 February 2009 (UTC)
Changing between varieties of English
[edit]
In a recent edit to the page No Line on the Horizon, you changed one or more words from one international variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.
For subjects exclusively related to Britain (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to other English-speaking countries, such as Canada, Australia, or New Zealand, use the appropriate variety of English used there. If it is an international topic, use the same form of English the original author used.
In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to the other, even if you don't normally use the version the article is written in. Respect other people's versions of English. They in turn should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style. If you have any queries about all this, you can ask me on my talk page or you can visit the help desk. Thank you. MelicansMatkin (talk) 00:54, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
Just wondering
[edit]Hi, I'm just wondering why you did this? The text doesn't change and the link still points to the same place. No big deal, just curious. ~ Ameliorate! 07:39, 17 April 2009 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:00, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:05, 24 November 2015 (UTC)