User talk:SeedEWound

Atlantic Creoles in the Age of Revolutions

Atlantic Creoles in the Age of Revolutions by Jane Landers will be a new page that I will be creating tomorrow. SeedEWound (talk) 05:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)

If I Were a Carpenter

added Leslie West 1975 cover version information, from the album The Great Fatsby SeedEWound (talk) 20:02, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Pujiang-1

edited Pujiang-1 for minor grammar. SeedEWound (talk) 20:07, 16 June 2020 (UTC)

Nobody has My Number

I operate with impunity like the others.SeedEWound (talk) 20:11, 3 July 2020 (UTC)

Saturday

ON THIS DAY there should be no reason to celebrate anything that happened many years ago. SeedEWound (talk) 16:53, 4 July 2020 (UTC)

John Hagee

Added information about John Hagee's support of 1968 presidential candidate George Wallace SeedEWound (talk) 23:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)

Today, a well meaning editor undid this edit, citing two specific things. One, that the editor could not see the article (that is a baseless claim as the article is available to anyone with access to newspaper archives), and secondly the editor claimed that the claim that Hagee supported the segregationist candidate George Wallace ("Segregation now, segregation tomorrow, segregation forever") is "exceptional" and requires more sources. However, I posit that the claim is not exceptional. It is just a fact. If facts are going to be denied, then the entire project is in jeopardy. SeedEWound (talk) 16:21, 10 July 2020 (UTC)

Bating (Blood Sport)

Added a paragraph about American Rodeo, which involves traumatizing animals and includes blood and death of animals for entertainment. SeedEWound (talk) 01:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Solomon's Temple

Removed a redundant sentence that expressed the concern that no one knew what gender the prostitutes at the temple happened to be. This statement is not a statement of fact. It is internally inconsistent, and based on one source's confusion. SeedEWound (talk) 01:06, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you assume ownership of articles, as you did at John Hagee.

Your message to Aroma Stylish was wrong in both your assumed ownership of the article and your threat of "punishment". There are no punishments on Wikipedia. It would be better if you stopped issuing cautions and warnings until you better understand Wikipedia's policies. Cabayi (talk) 19:43, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

how is what you are doing right now any different from what you claim I did. Btw, all I did was assert my edit which was respectfully, once again, this was a good edit with a good source. The edit itself has a consensus, as a third party agreed. If you are going to attack me like this, you should at least look at the edit I made that caused this. The person who undid my edit was wrong. You can pretend that it was good faith, but I cannot see how that is. The edit is sound, or, if it is not sound, then how is it not sound? You cannot even make an argument against it, yet, you come in here like YOU OWN the place, and make YOUR OWN THREATS. So, I am going to ask you one time and one time only to please REFRAIN FROM COMMENTING OR ever chasing all my edits all around. You are not an authority in my view. I did not claim ownership of John Hagee that is your allegation that you have made with what doesn't look like good faith to me. Cease and desist harassing me. I am making good faith edits and then being persecuted for revealing things that some people find, for ignorant reasons, uncomfortable to realize. That is not my concern, all I can do is make good faith edits and provide the link and the source. If you have a problem with my edit, you should attack my edit, not me. SeedEWound (talk) 21:03, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Not listening is a sign of bad faith. Talking through and having a clear agenda, which is obvious to anyone, and being Tendentious to a fault is obvious. One can see the bias at work in all of that individuals edits. Yet, you pretend not to see them, and continue to pretend good faith. However, the edit I made is correct, it cannot be undone, and you have been escalated. You may continue to comment here, but you should not be taking any more action unless you can say why the edit was not proper in the first place. Barring that, you are wasting everyone's time making threats.SeedEWound (talk) 21:20, 11 July 2020 (UTC)

Further more, I will not be condescended to by someone who is less than me. I am better than you. Therefore, you need to stop pretending that you have authority over anyone. SeedEWound (talk) 21:21, 11 July 2020 (UTC)