User talk:Seduisant/Archive 5

New Page Patrol survey

New page patrol – Survey Invitation

Hello Seduisant! The WMF is currently developing new tools to make new page patrolling much easier. Whether you have patrolled many pages or only a few, we now need to know about your experience. The survey takes only 6 minutes, and the information you provide will not be shared with third parties other than to assist us in analyzing the results of the survey; the WMF will not use the information to identify you.

If this invitation also appears on other accounts you may have, please complete the survey once only.
If this has been sent to you in error and you have never patrolled new pages, please ignore it.

Please click HERE to take part.
Many thanks in advance for providing this essential feedback.

You are receiving this invitation because you have patrolled new pages. For more information, please see NPP Survey. Global message delivery 13:12, 26 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: SoE

Hello. You have a new message at User talk:SMcCandlish's talk page. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 01:33, 6 January 2012 (UTC) Hello. You have a new message at User talk:SMcCandlish's talk page. Fixed! — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ʕ(^Õل^ō)ˀ Contribs. 01:57, 6 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		This barnstar is awarded to everyone who - whatever their opinion - contributed to the discussion about Wikipedia and SOPA. Thank you for being a part of the discussion. Presented by the Wikimedia Foundation.

Commons POO

I am requesting a rename on Commons. My current Commons name is SeduisantRedux. Seduisant (talk) 03:47, 17 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Project Punk Newsletter: February 2012 (Volume III, Issue I)

Announcements and news for WikiProject Punk music

February 2012:

Updates:

A central location to list the shared resources of our project has been created. If you own any books that you use frequently in your editing and that you are willing to share please add them to the list.
An article has been proposed for the Punk music collaboration of the month, as part of WikiWomen's history month. If you wish to, please express your opinion or propose an article at the collaboration page.
Benzband (talk · contribs) has started to tackle the unassessed Punk music articles backlog. There is more information on the talk page if you want to get involved.

Articles

Work has been ongoing over the past few months to clean up both halves of the list of punk rock bands

Features

If you see a picture, article, list list that lives up to the corresponding featured criteria, please nominate it.

Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.

16:30, 21 February 2012 (UTC)

User talk:209.112.248.178

Hi, after a level 4 ("final") warning, you should report vandals to WP:AIV where an admin will block them, rather than just giving them another warning. Best, HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 18:26, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 6

Hi. When you recently edited Honeypot (computing), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hacker (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 6 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 16

Hi. When you recently edited It Hurts to Be in Love, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Musicor (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 18:32, 16 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: My Compliments

Yes, I created WikiProject Death, but User:Jeraphine Gryphon did the most recent layout update. I agree it looks great, though! :) --Geniac (talk) 00:28, 23 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Look of Love

Just FYI: If/when you create an article for the Lesley Gore song, the correct title appears to be "Look of Love" (no "The"). See these many examples. Cheers! --ShelfSkewed Talk 18:12, 25 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Declined speedy deletion

I have declined your speedy deletion tagging of Freaky boiz. My feeling is that there are just enough references there to pass WP:CSD#A7 as a claim of importance. At least some of them appear to be reliable sources, so I think that if it is to be deleted, it needs to be a fuller discussion. If you still think the article should be deleted, please take it to WP:AFD (after doing WP:BEFORE to see if there are other valid references). Qwyrxian (talk) 11:29, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Pardofelis and Catopuma

Okay, these are the sources I've seen, so that we know where we are. MSW3, which was published in 2005, places the bay and Asian golden cats in Catopuma, and is presumably the source used in our articles. The IUCN redlist, whose pages on the subject were last revised in 2008, places all three in Pardofelis. The Handbook of the Mammals of the World, vol. 1, published in 2009, uses the MSW3 categorisation - although I note it has one of the same editors-in-chief.

The IUCN quotes as their source this article in Science magazine (registration required), alongside a then-unpublished paper apparently submitted to the Journal of Mammalogy, but which I have been unable to locate in the journal's archives. Looking at the Science paper, it simply asserts the use of Pardofelis (sensu lato), without specifically justifying it. The cladogram provides plausible grounds for the broader meaning, but does not demand it, since Catopuma would remain monophyletic.

So. Hmm. I'm not seeing much of a scientific consensus there, really. Anaxial (talk) 18:28, 30 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You're invited! New England Wikimedia General Meeting

	New England Wikimedia General Meeting
	The New England Wikimedia General Meeting will be a large-scale meetup of all Wikimedians (and friends) from the New England area in order to discuss regional coordination and possible formalization of our community (i.e., a chapter). Come hang out with other Wikimedians, learn more about ongoing activities, and help plan for the future! Potential topics: What is a Wikimedia chapter and should we work towards one? Planning of regular Boston meetups (any other New England cities?) Planning for upcoming coordinated events (Wikipedia Love Libraries, Wiki Loves Monuments, Wiknic, etc.) Outreach to universities (WikiProject Academical Village) and cultural institutions (GLAM) Wikimania DC is this summer. Your ideas!
	Sunday, April 22 1:30 PM – 4:30 PM	Conference Room C06, Johnson Building, Boston Public Library—Central Library 700 Boylston St., Boston MA 02116
Please sign up here: Wikipedia:Meetup/New England!

Message delivered by Dominic at 08:56, 11 April 2012 (UTC). Note: You can remove your name from this meetup invite list here.[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 11

Hi. When you recently edited Robert Salmon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peabody Museum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 11 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your HighBeam account is ready!

Good news! You now have access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research. Here's what you need to know:

Your account activation code has been emailed to your Wikipedia email address.
- Only 407 of 444 codes were successfully delivered; most failed because email was simply not set up (You can set it in Special:Preferences).
- If you did not receive a code but were on the approved list, add your name to this section and we'll try again.
The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1; 2) You’ll see the first page of a two-page registration. 3) Put in an email address and set up a password. (Use a different email address if you signed up for a free trial previously); 4) Click “Continue” to reach the second page of registration; 5) Input your basic information; 6) Input the activation code; 7) Click “Finish”. Note that the activation codes are one-time use only and are case-sensitive.
If you need assistance, email "help at highbeam dot com", and include "HighBeam/Wikipedia" in the subject line. Or go to WP:HighBeam/Support, or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 21:01, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the edit to SMiLE...

I deleted a single review that was an outlier. It was way off from virtually every other review written about this album. I read it, and the reviewer in question was not able to back up his bad rating with any real thought or analysis. The whole thing was 2 short paragraphs long and said nothing of value except "Pet Sounds is better" and then threw around some very pretentious phrases like "pop economy" to seem hip. It reads like a snob wanting to be the first to say the emperor has no clothes and thus look like an edgy reporter ahead of the crowd. Well, if the reviewer in question was at least able to express his criticism intelligently I would've kept the review up. But as it stands, it is an informally written, highly biased and all-around unhelpful bit of crap. It has no right to be used as an academic source. I removed it, and I'd do it again. The only reason I can think for you to disagree is because you want to have one stock "bad review" to "show balance" in the article, whether it's deserved or not. That, or you yourself are biased against me simply because I edited a page without being a member. Forgive me, but I've met many stuck up Wiki-editors with that mindset. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 165.190.89.140 (talk) 03:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Crossarchus

Re:Crossarchus

I know, an old edit, but it was sitting for multiple years - this ref is about "Crossarchus alexandri", not "Crossarchus" Bulwersator (talk) 10:28, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Thanks for the update on the Ptown article

I've never quite figured the best way to respond directly to a post on my talk page... that is, do I reply on your page, like this, or do I post on my page, so you can see both sides of the conversation... I chose the latter, so this is just a 'tickler' note pointing back to my response. Thanks!!! Groll†ech (talk) 00:18, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just wanted to let you know that I have created Long Point (Cape Cod). When you get a moment, I'd love to get your thoughts on it. Thanks! Groll†ech (talk) 00:41, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Inappropriate posting by this user

I am appalled at an inappropriate posting on my talk page from this user. Resorting to an ad hominem reference is unjustifiable. 98.229.11.248 (talk) 18:32, 2 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Project Punk Newsletter: May 2012 (Volume III, Issue II)

Announcements and news for WikiProject Punk music

May 2012:

Updates:

The project is trying to get a spot in the WikiProject report of The Signpost. For more information check the talk page.
The article proposed for Punk music collaboration of the month (as part of WikiWomen's history month) received no substantial edits. If you still wish to get involved more information is available at the talk page
The unassessed Punk music articles backlog has been tackled, thanks to pjoef (talk · contribs).

Articles

Work has been ongoing over the past few months to clean up both halves of the list of punk rock bands
Green Day and American Idiot have been nominated for Good Article Status by Yasht101 (talk · contribs)
21st Century Breakdown has been put up for a peer review by TheSpecialUser (talk · contribs)
Tom Gabel has been substantially expanded and rewritten by IllaZilla (talk · contribs)

Features

If you see a picture, article, or list that lives up to the corresponding featured criteria, please nominate it.

Delivered by In actu (Guerillero) on behalf of WikiProject Punk. You are receiving this because your user name is listed in Category:WikiProject Punk music members or on our participants list. If you would like to stop these sorts of updates please remove the userbox from your profile, remove the category from your profile, and/or move your name down to the Inactive/former members section of the participants list. Thanks.

Cheers,

benzband (talk) & Guerillero | My Talk 06:41, 24 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Claims of Vandalism?

What is your problem, buddy? I don't remember "vandalizing" any pages. Don't smack people with false vandalism claims, it's not nice.

Thembonesareme (talk) 16:29, 27 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re. Vandal

That's alright, I should have expected something like that - esp. on an article for a person of infamy/controversy - might happen. Hope someone can bring the real joker to wiki-justice. Good-bye.

Thembonesareme (talk) 17:40, 28 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

7 States

Yes, deep sleep without dreams. Dreaming is different than sleeping. --BwB (talk) 14:36, 8 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Stuy

The school is still prestigious. This IP editor is not, however. :) -- Y not? 18:26, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion contested: Google Compute Engine

Hello Seduisant. I am just letting you know that I contested the speedy deletion of Google Compute Engine, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Not unambiguously promotional. Thank you. →Σ τ c. 03:22, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Articles on Cats

We happen to have both edited Wildcat recently, and i think you'll want the whole picture these present:

(I don't know from ... shall i say Batguano? ... about cats (and don't recall what drew me into my stylistic edits), so i've no perspective on the IP in question.)
--Jerzy•t 20:42, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That was not vandalism!

In the page 'Big Cat', I noticed that in the 'Evolution' section there was a mistake, because it contradicts the reference where it comes from. If you look at the page of the reference, it says 'About 3.6 to 2.5 million years ago, the jaguar began to evolve, while lions and leopards split from one other about 3.1 to 1.95 million years ago.', whereas in the article it says that firstly lions split from the group, and then jaguars from leopards. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Laia lion (talk • contribs) 09:41, 10 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]