User talk:Security50023
January 2012
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to AlliedBarton, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place "
{{helpme}}
" on your talk page and someone will drop by to help. - The following is the log entry regarding this warning: AlliedBarton was changed by Security50023 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.872587 on 2012-01-09T18:37:52+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:38, 9 January 2012 (UTC)
Have you checked your contributions list?
Abigail was here :D Talk to Me. Email Me. 14:36, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
JamesBWatson (talk) 15:30, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
I have removed your block per your email to me. Please make sure your edits are neutral and well supported by sources. In general, if what you are adding to our articles on a company looks like something that is covered on the company's website then we probably don't need it in the article. Things like organizational structure and how to submit expense reports aren't really useful to our readers. Thanks. Syrthiss (talk) 16:32, 10 January 2012 (UTC) ps - yeah, I've tried to reform articles like that one before but it is hard.