User talk:Secondary Source

Personal Attacks

Regarding your comments please refrain from personal attacks, assume good faith, and use the discussion areas of an article to discuss the article. Thanks. Ste4k 17:42, 12 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No personal attacks

Please see Wikipedia's no personal attacks policy. Comment on content, not on the contributor; personal attacks damage the community and deter users. Note that continued personal attacks may lead to blocks for disruption. Please stay cool and keep this in mind while editing. Thank you. — Fire Fox 10:54, 13 July '06

Calm down

Please stop your personal attacks against User: Ste4k. Calling her an "asshole" is extremely unproductive. You might want to think about the teachings of ACIM on forgiveness. ;) Also, do not remove comments from talk pages JChap (Talk) 11:19, 13 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

Please do not remove warnings from your talk page or replace them with offensive content. Removing or maliciously altering warnings from your talk page will not remove them from the page history. If you continue to remove or vandalize warnings from your talk page, you will lose your privilege of editing your talk page. Thanks. 19:35, 13 July 2006 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to remove warning messages from your talk page, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. 11:37, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

This is your last warning. Removing warnings from your talk page is considered vandalism. You will be blocked from editing Wikipedia and your talk page will be protected from editing if you do it again. 15:28, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia for using sockpuppets to get around a final warning. Your block will expire in 24 hours. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Any further abuse of Wikipedia will lead to further, potentially longer, blocks. PinchasC | £€åV€ m€ å m€§§åg€ 03:22, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Man crush

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Man crush, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Serpent's Choice 04:29, 15 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Markronchettikointv.jpg

Thank you for uploading Image:Markronchettikointv.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot (talk) 14:28, 8 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use Image:Markronchettikoinpublicityphoto.jpg

Replaceable fair use

Thanks for uploading Image:Markronchettikoinpublicityphoto.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Jfire (talk) 22:15, 18 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]