User talk:SecondThirdAndSixth

Welcome!

Hi TwoThousandWeeks! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Fragrant Peony (talk) 04:49, 28 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You need to add references or sources

for you recent edits at School shooting. Carptrash (talk) 19:38, 16 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war; read about how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

List of mass shootings in Russia reverts

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Why are you reverting to wrong number on List of mass shootings in Russia? Smeagol 17 (talk) 22:18, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s right number, according to source. TwoThousandWeeks (talk) 22:23, 27 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-europe-67647620 5+2=7 Smeagol 17 (talk) 14:39, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

https://t.me/bazabazon/23565 "ранила четверых учеников (трех мальчиков и одну девочку)" 4+2=6 TwoThousandWeeks (talk) 15:06, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

BBC is a "reliable source" here. Basa isnt. Also, early information is less reliable. See also here https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/6394433 " 14-летняя ученица восьмого класса, открыла стрельбу, а затем совершила самоубийство. В результате погибла еще одна школьница, пятеро подростков пострадали." Please self-revert. Smeagol 17 (talk) 15:36, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Four students were wounded by gunshots, fifth broken her leg. Afanaskina injured four TwoThousandWeeks (talk) 15:50, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Even if it is true, the list contains all injured in the incidents, regardless of cause. Smeagol 17 (talk) 15:55, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Birthday

What relevance does someone's birthday have to the encyclopedia article? Articles aren't indiscriminate assemblies of information. Acroterion (talk) 00:24, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not "someone's birthday", it's the perpetrator's birthday. All Wikipedia articles about mass shootings provide the dates of birth of perpetrators. TwoThousandWeeks (talk) 03:17, 30 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

July 2024

Hello, I'm Jdcomix. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, List of mass shootings in Russia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. The source you added was deprecated. Jdcomix (talk) 20:06, 28 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:49, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]