User talk:Sebsox6

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scott The Woz (January 4)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by CNMall41 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Page was deleted one year ago. Since that time, there doesn't appear to be any coverage outside of blogs and fandom type articles. Nothing I see that would be considered significant coverage or in-depth. In addition, the page is highly promotional and not even close to what a Wikipedia entry should be.

CNMall41 (talk) 21:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Sebsox6! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CNMall41 (talk) 21:46, 4 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2022

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to GameCube, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. So far all of your many edits have been unencyclopedic, including repeated disruption[1][2] and vandalism.[3] Stop editing until you read and understand encyclopedic policies and principles. Users can be blocked for this. — Smuckola (talk) 21:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Smuckola. I apologize for making unencyclopedic edits in the past. I should've checked the discussion regarding my edits. The case of vandalism, however, was an unintended mistake, which was resolved. Sebsox6 (talk) 09:23, 5 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]