User talk:Seborg Vest

A belated welcome!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Seborg Vest! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

If you don't already know, you should sign your posts on talk pages by using four tildes (~~~~) to insert your username and the date.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Eagleash (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Eco-Lighthouse

I have merged the content of your draft into the Eco-Lighthouse article and also moved the target page to include the capitalisation. Eagleash (talk) 13:27, 26 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eagleash: Dear Eagleash, thank you so much for your effort! You deserve a fully analog bouquet of flowers or box of chocolates - but I guess Wikipedia doesn't work like that ;-). Sorry for the late reply, I was away from my computer for a couple of days. Thanks for the welcoming message with links as well. I'll do my best to follow the guidelines. With kind regards, Seborg Vest (talk) 07:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

No problem; it seemed like a reasonable idea to get on and merge the item (etc.) otherwise could easily have lain about until someone did something with it. BTW (please don't do so now) but at the top of each editor's talk page there should be a small red heart icon; clicking on that allows the sending of 'barnstars' or virtual gifts. Barnstars I think, comes from the idea of building a barn... we are building an encyclopedia; or so it says, somewhere. Eagleash (talk) 12:33, 31 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by HitroMilanese was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Seborg Vest/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to User:Seborg Vest/sandbox, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Hitro talk 11:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Seborg Vest! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Hitro talk 11:19, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@HitroMilanese:

Thank you for your reply! I think I see your point and I give it another try. Things I changed: - language, using words like "aim to" and "intend" before results one tries to obtain with EMAS Easy - I added some EU-projects with citations to the History chapter - I have been more clear about the method being kind of out-of-date

I think EMAS Easy is worth a page in Wikipedia, because its aim is to solve a cause that still needs attention: how to get SMEs to work more systematically to reduce their impact on environment. The information in the article may be of practical use for others. I have done my best to find references. Valid websites are mostly from consultants still offering the method and local authorities informing about EMAS Easy in their own language and I did not want to include these. I hope the changes I made are sufficient.Seborg Vest (talk) 12:45, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: EMAS Easy (October 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MoonlightVector was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:EMAS Easy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:EMAS Easy, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

MoonlightVector^{Talk page} 16:09, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:EMAS Easy

Hello, Seborg Vest. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:EMAS Easy, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 23:40, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:EMAS Easy

Hello, Seborg Vest. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "EMAS Easy".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:27, 6 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]