User talk:Seb az86556/archive24

Systaime

Regarding the edit summary: "Reverted 3 edits by Cindamuse (talk): Have you been to that page? it's a snow-screen, not a source." Yep, I saw the flash intro. I also saw the site following the flash. In any regard, not appropriate to place a BLP PROD when a source exists. There is also an interwiki link to the French article. The PROD was really not the appropriate action for this article. That said, through your observation, the website of the subject is certainly poorly designed. Best regards, Cind.amuse 10:21, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's "yesterday's snow". That being said, I certainly do not have time to sit through some snow-screen for minutes or whatever it is to get the presumed source. So... I'd still content that my tagging was correct. And no, I don't read French. Cheers! Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 10:26, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vell Baria hold off on G4 can not find an afd

Hello. Deletion log does not indicate in afd. Can you point me the way to it? Thanks Dloh cierekim 14:53, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

(talk page stalker) Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Velle Baria Favonian (talk) 14:54, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, Favonian. I also started a section on ANI. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 14:56, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That's what I needed. Dloh cierekim 15:24, 11 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Vell

See my talk page, please Dloh cierekim 02:15, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

User:PatakaZikatuna/Vell Baria

Actually, she can work on it there. It was tagged as userpage and had a noindex tag, so seach engines will ignore it. I was hoping she would be content w/ it there and stop trying to create in userspace. A net positive for everyone. Dloh cierekim 13:45, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You do know what this means, right? In a few days, we will deal with again, just as we have over the past year; she'll manage to come up with a different spelling and recreate it. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 13:47, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, she can do that anyway. She obviously has copy a offline somewhere. We can deal with it when/if then. Dloh cierekim 14:08, 12 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

for the copyedit. I'm getting exhausted cleaning up after someone who can't be bothered to reach for the shift key :P rʨanaɢ (talk) 03:20, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

if that was the only problem, I'd be delighted. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 03:21, 14 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Seb az86556. You have new messages at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dodger, Bonzo and the Rest (Dramarama Episode).
Message added 14:24, 18 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Hasteur (talk) 14:24, 18 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Seb az86556. You have new messages at Favonian's talk page.
Message added 20:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Favonian (talk) 20:59, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Eugène Terre'Blanche was a disgusting racist....

don't post here again, keep it over there.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

... but the stuff I'm posting about him is true. I don't know why you keep reverting it outside of an apparent agenda that seeks to divorce his murder from the endemic of extremely similar murders in South Africa. Terre'Blanche is a hideous person but his murder was also hideous and the content I'm listing about him is not false. Instead of reverting stuff summarily perhaps you can instead help choose one of the dozens of sources that fits whatever criteria you're so stringently seeking? Blue Danube (talk) 05:38, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:V, WP:OR, and WP:SYNTH. And no, you're the one who wants to add it, so you're the one who needs to find an adequate source. Thus far, you have failed to do so. Please be aware of the fact that continued misrepresentation of sources may lead to getting yourself blocked. Choyoołʼįįhí:Seb az86556 ^{> haneʼ} 06:50, 29 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See WP:DICK and Wikipedia:ABC. I dare you to explain which specific detail was not represented in those sources for the old edit I was trying to place there earlier. And yes, I have rewritten the information so that it matches the new source found here. If you revert it after this subsequent rewrite with the new source it may lead to getting yourself blocked.

Maybe we should stop circling each other and find a way to satisfactorily get that fact where it belongs. Blue Danube (talk) 01:26, 30 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.