User talk:Seaver11171944
Welcome!
[edit]
|
August 2007
[edit]Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to Ted Kennedy. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. —C.Fred (talk) 00:52, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
- I second the previous statement with regards to your edits to Joe Montana. If you would like to discuss this further, I have opened a discussion on Talk:Joe Montana. Additionally, it is generally frowned upon to sign article pages - unless it is a project or something of the sort - you may want to avoid it. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 23:59, 29 August 2007 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Joe Montana. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content which gains a consensus among editors. —C.Fred (talk) 00:03, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
- I have reported you at WP:AIV as you have made no attempts to discuss your edits with anyone and they are vandalistic in nature. Juan Miguel Fangio| ►Chat 00:06, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
—C.Fred (talk) 00:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Out of curiosity...
[edit]Out of curiosity, does the number sequence "11171944" mean "November 17, 1944" for any reason? It just jumped out at me, and this seems quite reasonable. Ksy92003(talk) 00:13, 30 August 2007 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
[edit]You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Seaver11171944 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. ZimZalaBim talk 03:42, 1 September 2007 (UTC)