User talk:Seasdas

Welcome!

Hello, Seasdas, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Tibor Frank, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 00:55, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Tibor Frank

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Tibor Frank requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. This article or image appears to be a direct copy from http://das.elte.hu/content/faculty/frank/. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. reddogsix (talk) 00:55, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tibor Frank (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines for academics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tibor Frank and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 23:47, 8 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tibor Frank (December 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted information, which is not permitted on Wikipedia.

This submission appears to be taken from http://das.elte.hu/content/faculty/frank/. Wikipedia cannot accept material copied from elsewhere, unless it explicitly exists under a compatible licence and is written in an acceptable tone—this includes material that you own the copyright to. You should attribute the content of a draft to outside sources, using citations, but copying and pasting or closely paraphrasing sources is not acceptable. The entire draft should be written using your own words and structure.

You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

Draft:Tibor Frank may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 05:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Seasdas, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! FoCuS contribs; talk to me! 05:08, 18 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright

I was tagged in the talkpage comment at User_talk:FoCuSandLeArN#Deleted_page_draft_retrieval. Unfortunately I cannot restore the draft article until permission is given for the material at this website. Something to take into consideration is that the owner of the website would have to be the one to file a ticket through WP:OTRS and that it's very likely that you will still have to re-write some portions of the content, as official material is almost always written to promote the individual or topic in the best light possible and/or contains a lot of content that could be summed up more succinctly. Remember - these websites are written to make the person look good and in many cases they accomplish this by being overly verbose or listing every accomplishment, including the minor and trivial details. Not only that, but it's usually better to try to re-write the content because pages with content taken from elsewhere (especially official sites) are constant targets for incoming editors, as it can be seen as promotional even if the content itself is neutral. I've dealt with a few pages where the content was pretty neutral yet in the end we had to re-write the content just to keep people from tagging it with copyvio and promotional templates.

Also, if you're going to look for permission this means that you likely represent Frank in some form or fashion. Make sure that you read over the conflict of interest guidelines and disclose any COI. Even if you're just one of his students, you need to disclose this up front for transparency's sake. Offhand your edits aren't really problematic (other than the copyvio issue) so I don't see there being a huge problem even if you do have a COI. Mostly I'm saying this as a preventative measure since an undisclosed COI can lead to issues in the long run, even if not disclosing the info wasn't intentional. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:23, 24 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Tokyogirl79,

Thanks a lot for your reply. I'll ask for permission for the website soon, and of course will make the necessary changes, and also disclose COI as you mentioned once the draft is restored. One last question: after the permission is given will the draft article be restored at the same Articles for Creation site? Many thanks: Seasdas

AfC notification: Draft:Tibor Frank has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Tibor Frank. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 20:41, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tibor Frank has been accepted

Tibor Frank, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

DGG ( talk ) 03:47, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Seasdas (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please advise why I was blocked. Thank you! Seasdas (talk) 21:10, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 21:20, 29 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.