User talk:Seanmcwatt

This is Seanmcwatt's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

AfC notification: User:Seanmcwatt/sandbox has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at User:Seanmcwatt/sandbox. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (November 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

YouTube is not a reliable source. The band's own web site is not independent.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Seanmcwatt/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 04:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Seanmcwatt, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 04:22, 22 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (January 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of music-related topics and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Sources are simply announcements and mentions, and none of this satisfies our standards.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Seanmcwatt/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 00:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mandroid Echostar (2) (April 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Topcipher was:

Thank you for your submission, but the subject of this article already exists in Wikipedia. You can find it and improve it at Mandroid Echostar instead.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mandroid Echostar (2) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

TopCipher (talk) 06:43, 4 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for File:News-Mandroid Echostar release instrumental version of “Citadels”.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:News-Mandroid Echostar release instrumental version of “Citadels”.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 14:00, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mandroid Echostar (2) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Mandroid Echostar (2), a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Mandroid Echostar (2)

Hello, Seanmcwatt. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Mandroid Echostar".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Kostas20142 (talk) 11:26, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Anatomy

You want to get rid of eponyms? Start a discussion at WT:ANAT. For now, Iztwoz has done a rvt on your edits. And I've done a rvt on your edits at two pages. GBFEE (talk) 20:09, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello -- not sure why this is a controversial edit... the eponyms are not the official names of these structures. I don't suggest removing them completely, just having the proper anatomical term appear before reference to an eponym (which has no anatomical relevance). I have left a message in WT:ANAT... I'm relatively new to Wikipedia editing... who gets final say? Seanmcwatt (talk) 20:53, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

It's a matter of WP:MOS - where there is a commonly known and used name - that will be the generally agreed page name; searches on nGrams and Google will usually show the favour for the commonly known name which may or may not be the more technical term. Wikipedia is for a general readership, and technically correct terms of anatomy and medicine are not always the well-known and well-used names or terms that will be searched for by a general reader. The usual formatting or styling uses the page name as the first reference - to change that format needs the page name to be changed. This can sometimes be done without discussion if the usage is absolutely clear; though mostly a page name change needs to be proposed and reasoned for on the talk page where it remains open for discussion. Best Iztwoz (talk) 16:38, 21 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Zefr did a rvt on your edits too. GBFEE (talk) 20:11, 20 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]