User talk:Seanjpf

Speedy deletion of SierraSil

A tag has been placed on SierraSil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. // Chris ^{(complaints)•(contribs)} 17:06, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to re-add it, that's fine, just please make sure it meets the notability guidelines. Thanks, Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 17:34, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I could restore it to a page in your userspace like User:Seanjpf/Sandbox so you can work on it without having to worry about deletion. I'd really recommend that, it lets you work in peace until you're ready to move it into the mainspace. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 17:47, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored it there, if you want me to take a look at it before you recreate it, I'd be happy to. Best, Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 18:58, 10 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I've been so busy lately. It looks really good, it's survived its first few hours so I'd guess it'll be alright. I added the reference list, but otherwise it looks good. I'm really sorry I couldn't take a look at it sooner, but it's a good article and should do fine. Best of luck in your future Wikipedia endeavours, I hope you stay with us. Don't hesitate to drop me a message if you need something, I'm usually better about responding. Keilana|^{Parlez ici} 23:17, 19 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Notability tag

Not sure why this article was approved months ago, upon completion of rewrites, and now is flagged again. Can someone advise?

Hi. I've removed the recently placed "{{hangon}}" tag from this article, as it's only required for speedy deletions, which this article seems to have moved on from. The current tag suggests that the importance or significance of SierraSil is elaborated, and any glowing praise or peacock terms are reduced. The tags may stay there for quite some time, or they may suddenly be removed one day, or the article may be put up for a deletion debate - who can tell. If there is no elaboration of the reason for the tags at some point in the future you might even remove them yourself. As always, more independent references may help. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 16:51, 14 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of SierraSil

A tag has been placed on SierraSil, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sticky Parkin 17:40, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If there really was a better version, to me it's returned to being blatant advertising IMHO. Sticky Parkin 17:45, 16 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sierrasil

I've asked an admin who's work I know to give me his opinion. Sticky Parkin 02:48, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

He's not got round to getting back to me. What I suggest is you work on the article in your user space User:Seanjpf/SierraSil, they won't be as keen to delete it from there. Make it as non-advertisingy as possible. Then ask User:Star Mississippi what she thinks of the new version, as s/he performed the deletion, and if she says it's ok launch it in main encyclopedia space. Sticky Parkin 03:36, 11 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted content has been copied to User:Seanjpf/SierraSil. –xeno (talk) 13:31, 5 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

copy of page- not me

I'm not an admin so can't see deleted pages. You'd need to ask any of these folk who've been active recently Category:Wikipedia_administrators_who_will_provide_copies_of_deleted_articles. I suggest User:Xenocidic or User:Iridescent. P.S. Happy New Year :) Sticky Parkin 01:43, 3 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Simone Orlando

The article Simone Orlando has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Xtzou (Talk) 00:52, 18 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]