User talk:Seanjmcm

January 2016

Hello, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. This is just a note to let you know that I've moved the draft that you were working on to Draft:Louise Conroy, from its old location at User:Seanjmcm/sandbox. This is because the Draft namespace is the preferred location for Articles for Creation submissions. Please feel free to continue to work on it there. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to ask me on my talk page. Thank you. /wiae /tlk 22:04, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Louise Conroy (January 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jodi.a.schneider was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage about the subject in reliable sources that are independent of the subject—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Louise Conroy and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 03:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Seanjmcm, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jodi.a.schneider (talk) 03:27, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Blackbird (codec)

Hi, I'm Nick Moyes. Seanjmcm, thanks for creating Blackbird (codec)!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. I'm not convinced your sources demonstrate this subject meets WP:NSOFT as they point only to patents and company-released news (RNS Number: 7846U). If you can find multiple independent 3rd party sources that have actually written about it in depth, it would stand more chance of surviving a articles for deletion discussion. I will monitor and come back in a week or so to see if it has been further enhanced.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Nick Moyes (talk) 11:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Blackbird (codec) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Blackbird (codec) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackbird (codec) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dom from Paris (talk) 17:10, 12 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), such as at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blackbird (codec), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:

Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( in the enhanced toolbar, or if you use the old "classic" toolbar) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. Dom from Paris (talk) 18:08, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Normal People

Please note that "Book:" namespace is not for making Wikipedia articles about books; it is for a special type of internal Wikiproject where our content is made into and republished as reference books where we're the authors of the book. A regular article about somebody else's book uses the same title format as any other Wikipedia article, namely just the name of the topic itself with no prefix in front of it — but the novel Normal People already has an article, so any further edits you want to make to it belong there. Thanks. Bearcat (talk) 20:28, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]