User talk:Seanhalle

Seanhalle, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Seanhalle! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Please join other people who edit Wikipedia at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space on Wikipedia where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:20, 13 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion discussion about Proto-runtime

Hello, Seanhalle,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Proto-runtime should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Proto-runtime .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Modern.Jewelry.Historian (talk) 02:49, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proto-runtime

Hi Sean - Thanks for adding knowledge to Wikipedia. To enable this article to survive the deletion, you will need to add independent references discussing the subject, establishing independent notability. From what I've seen, you may still have a challenge adding the contant to an existing higher level article, because the external references are not sufficient. Remember, original research is not eligible, it must be editorial (ie journal published) citations.--MJH (talk) 21:15, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Installation time

The article Installation time has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

wkipedia is not a dictionary

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TheLongTone (talk) 11:20, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Where can more information about execution models be found?

You authored a page titled Execution model, and I'm trying to find out more about them. But as far as I see, your article is all there is. I can't find execution models Scott's Programming Language Pragmatics, nor general treatments of them in a google search for computer science textbook "execution model".

Where did you originally learn about these? Thanks!

216.114.117.77 (talk) 02:45, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Google search: Java execution model: https://cs111.wellesley.edu/~cs111/archive/cs111_fall97/public_html/lectures/jem/jem.html

Spark execution model is covered in this Coursera course: https://www.coursera.org/lecture/big-data-analysis/spark-execution-model-1YdTx and this https://deepsense.ai/understanding-apache-sparks-execution-model-using-sparklisteners-part-1/

And so on. It's a fundamental thing. A language consists of a grammar/syntax plus an execution model. The execution model is the behavior part.

Proposed deletion of Embedded style language

The article Embedded style language has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references whatsoever. Orphaned for a decade.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. PepperBeast (talk) 18:47, 21 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It would be a shame to delete this. I added reference to Scala, which is a popular programming language, and it was desinged explicitly to support embeddeding languages into Scala. Chisel, is an example of such an embdded language. I apologise that I don't have more time to add more references.. but I will link other articles to this one. 95.82.46.168 (talk) 09:05, 22 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I have added links from Chisel page, Scala page and Haskell page to this page on Embedded Style Language. Please review and if these resolve the issues, remove the proposal to delete. Seanhalle (talk) 07:46, 23 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embedded style language moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Embedded style language. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:20, 13 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Embedded style language

Hello, Seanhalle. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Embedded style language, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:06, 13 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]