User talk:Sean McPhillips
Welcome!
[edit]
|
McPhillips Genealogy Search - Questionable assertion of the Phillip MacMahon origin of McPhillips
[edit]Hello again,
This is the other Sean McPhillips. I have been doing some additional extension research, specifically tracking down the "Phillip MacMahon" origin of the McPhillips name. In "The Book of Ulster Surnames" (Robert Bell), his reference is The Monaghan Story(Peadar Livingstone). The reference in The Monaghan Story is in the Clogher Record, which you site in the Wikipedia article on "Clones Abbey". When you look at this specific reference, on p.176 it states "It is possible that, just as the Monaghan surname, McPhillips owes its origin to Phillip MacMahon, the famous Comharb of Clones, who died in 1486." Note that this reference begins with "It is possible...". This suggests that this reference is NOT definitive, merely a possibility. Although, it does appear to further reference "AU", implying the Annals of Ulster, but no specific reference within the AU.
I recommend modifying this reference (and subsequent references like in the "Clones Abbey" to reflect this until further confirmation.
--Smcphillips (talk)Sean McPhillips, mcphillipssean@aol.com--
Thanks for your interest, Updated possible in Reference. You'll find the info in the gaelic edition of the Irish/Ulster Annals. Surnames such as Philbin, McPhillips and McArdle are lost in translation in the online english edition of the Annals. Mac Pilib & Mac Philib does however appear in the Gaelic edition in the Irish/ulster Annals. The surname was common among the McMahons of Oriel, O'Reillys in the Kingdom of Breifne & Maguires of Fermanagh between the 14th & 17th centuries. Worth noting that Irish gaelic was the spoken language at the time and Historians Peadar Livingstone, Rev. Pádraig Ó Gallachair were fluent Irish/gaelic speakers and would have studied the original documents. Robert Bell explains in page 2 / Book of Ulster Surnames about different spellings, translations, half-translations, and miss-translations and it does appear there were different translation of names e.g. Séamus mac Pilib Mac Mathghamhna or Séamus mhic Philib Mag Mathghamhna. he was also known as just Séamus mhic Philib in the Annuals, But Other Historian translated his name as James McMahon, online english translation is James son of Philip Mac Mahon other historians would have translated the name as James Mac Philip Mac Mahon. It seems some people back in the middle ages went with their fathers christian name as their surname rather than the clan surname.
Sean McPhillips(talk) 20:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
McPhillips Genealogy Search - Clan Donald vs. MacMahon origin
[edit]Hello,
My name is also Sean McPhillips. I am conducting an extensive genealogy search of the "McPhillips" name. I have uncovered significant evidence that it descends from Clan Donald and is supported by the official Clan Donald USA genealogist (www.clan-donald-usa.org). However, this wikipedia page and its references suggest that it descends from MacMahon. I have checked the reference and, while it does mention McPhillips, I cannot seem to locate the footnotes within these referneces supporting the McPhillips relationship to MacMahon. I have confirmed that MacMahon is NOT a Clan Donald name, but McPhillips appears to be a Clan Donald name. Clan Donald references are at the bottom of this email.
I have joined the Family Tree DNA projects under the names Phillips, MacMahon, and Clan Donald. I'm waiting on the results. But, what I am seeing with McMahon vs. Clan Donald appears to be in conflict. There is no mention of Clan Donald on the "McPhillips (surname)" page in wikipedia, with the exception of the "similar names" being in the Info Box. Those "similar names" are Clan Donald names (again, see bottom of this email for info forwarded from Clan Donald USA).
Please advise on your references and how they reconcile with the Clan Donald references.
Sean McPhillips, mcphillipssean@aol.com
Here is what I have from the official Clan Donald Genealogy authority in the USA:
From Clan Donald name book: MACPHILIP - A form of MACKILLOP (109).
109. MACKILLOP - From Lochaber, Islay, Kintyre or Arran. They derive from: Gaelic Mac Fhilib - "son of Philip" - Lochaber - KEPPOCH, Islay & Kintyre - Clan Donald SOUTH.
Most MacKillops seem to trace their anme to Lochaber/Keppoch. Sister Mary MacKillop of Keppoch went to 19th century Australia, and her good works led to her official sainthood a few years ago.
However, Glengarry territory is "just across the street" from Keppoch territory and, if you know the emigrant ancestor was from Glengarry territory, then that is what you are. If you don't know where he came from, then Keppoch is the most likely home.
Just remembered. From roster of Keppoch's Regt. at Culloden, 1746.
MacPhilip, Angus, Torgulbin Surrendered May '46
MacPhilip, Donald, Brunachan Surrendered May '46
MacPhilip, Donald, Daddunderig Surrendered May '46
MacPhilip, John, Moy Surrendered May '46
This would seem to cinch it for Keppoch.
Jim McDonald, Genealogist, Clan Donald USA, 9131 Brighton Place, Savannah, GA 31406, 912-354-7149
--Smcphillips (talk) 17:45, 31 August 2010 (UTC)
Thanks for your interested, I put the irish claim up first to provoke a reaction because i was curious in what other people (especially other McPhillipses) had to say. I've since decided to change the page and write about the etymology of the surname and list different Irish/Scottish clans who used different forms of the surname. This page is now a collection of what different historians and sites have wrote about the surname. However, I wouldn't be to quick to dismiss Peader Livingstone as his footnotes and references are numbered and can be found from page 609-634 in his book The Monaghan story. I'm not denying the Scottish side of the name, but in fairnest it's up to you to write about the scottish side as you have more information. www.clan-donald-usa.org only list MacPhilip as a gaelic form of MACKILLOP, which is already mentioned on this page. if you have any info please upload it. thanks
Sean McPhillips(talk) 20:35, 29 January 2011 (UTC)
November 2010
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:
- editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
- participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
- linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. 7 03:51, 16 November 2010 (UTC)
Conflict of interest
[edit]Alex, Just wanted to get advice. I got tagged as having a close connection/Conflict of interest with http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colin_McPhillips. I have an interest in my surname, but I'm not related or associated with Colin McPhillips. I've never meet the man. Kind of regretting i used my real name here as i wouldnt have had a problem if i used a nickname. I've supplied references, but this dosen't seem good enough. I'd appriciate some feedback so that this dosen't happen again as i don't want to get in trouble. Hope to here from you soon. regards --Sean McPhillips (talk) 23:32, 20 July 2011 (UTC) Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:AlexGWU"
Sean, as long as the article contains verifiable citations and references and with regards to articles about people it has notability references it should not matter who publishes the article. You may want to get an admin involved as well. Use the articles talk page to indicate article is in compliance with Wiki rules.AlexGWU (talk) 18:06, 22 July 2011 (UTC)
- I have removed the neutrality template from the article. I don't think it belongs there AlexGWU (talk) 18:44, 29 July 2011 (UTC)
Albert McPhillips
[edit]Hi, was wondering if you have any relation to Albert McPhillips and could locate an obituary if he is deceased? Thank you in advance, Connormah (talk) 02:16, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Hi Connor, I'm not a close relative. I was wondering about the same thing myself, I was also curious to find out if he was a son or nephew of Albert Edward McPhillips as i wanted to link the 2 pages. [1] has a lot of info about the McPhillips family, But I couldnt find any info about Albert DeBurgo McPhillips. dukes of connaught regiment might have some info on [2] . Sorry I couldn't be more Help, Sean McPhillips (talk) 13:23, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
- Hi, thanks for the reply. From what I have researched, he was the son of Albert Edward McPhiliips (per a Google Books search), but that's all I can offer. Chances are he is deceased and died somewhere in the late 80s or 1990s, thats where the obituary coverage online is thin. Connormah (talk) 20:02, 8 August 2011 (UTC)
Possibly unfree File:Admcphillips.jpg
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Admcphillips.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you object to the listing for any reason. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 22:27, 6 October 2013 (UTC)
Hi Stefan, sorry for late reply. i've no objection to delete the image. thanks for the heads up, Sean McPhillips (talk) 20:15, 1 january 2014 (UTC)
I'm afraid I've nominated for deletion, as seems to lack Wikipedia:Notability (authors) however please add sources if there are more. Thanks In ictu oculi (talk) 18:30, 8 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Sean McPhillips. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Blood Will Tell (2007 film) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as nothing of substance was found in a WP:BEFORE that could help support notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DonaldD23 talk to me 01:23, 29 July 2021 (UTC)