User talk:Seahorse17a

June 2023

This is your only warning; if you remove or blank page contents or templates from Wikipedia again, as you did at Ignjat Đurđević, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Heart ^(talk) 18:15, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I apologize for my mistake in the process of changing the page, I want to remove the part related to ethnicity, because it is clearly misinformation and by checking the references you can see the validity of the information, given that it is about Serbian pages and sources that provocatively question Dubrovnik's belonging to the Croatian state (today) and cultural framework (in history). Like for example "Kako je hrvatstvo na silu ušlo u Dubrovnik" Intermagazin.rs. And many SANU articles. I think that they have no right to be used as a reliable source of information. And this not the first time that their editor are doing this. Seahorse17a (talk) 18:28, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 18:24, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Seahorse17a (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I apologize for my mistake in the process of changing the page, I want to remove the part related to ethnicity, because it is clearly misinformation and by checking the references you can see the validity of the information, given that it is about Serbian pages and sources that provocatively question Dubrovnik's belonging to the Croatian state (today) and cultural framework (in history). Like for example "Kako je hrvatstvo na silu ušlo u Dubrovnik" Intermagazin.rs. And many SANU articles. I think that they have no right to be used as a reliable source of information. And this not the first time that their editors are doing this.Seahorse17a (talk) 18:38, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
the block is no longer necessary because you
1. understand what you have been blocked for,
2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Yamla (talk) 20:23, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.