Jump to content

User talk:Sdanielle16

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hello, Sdanielle16, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.

I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.

Handouts
Additional Resources
  • You can find answers to many student questions on our Q&A site, ask.wikiedu.org

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:31, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

December 2017

[edit]

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Illegal immigration to the United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:49, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Illegal immigration to the United States

[edit]

Hi, I wanted to let you know that your edits to Illegal immigration to the United States were reverted by Natureium because they were unsourced.

All content must be sourced in order to be added to an article, but especially when it comes to articles that are inherently controversial such as this one. (Especially with the current Presidency, which makes it even more controversial.) This particular article is under sanctions, which means that edits will be more closely scrutinized than they would be at most other articles. This means that when it comes to editing this article people need to make especially sure that their edits pass Wikipedia's guidelines on notability, neutrality, and so on. On this note, I must also warn you about tone - the content would not be considered neutral, as it would be seen as opinion statement on Wikipedia due to how it was written. You added this in good faith, however this is kind of an example of how careful you need to be when editing on Wikipedia, to make sure that your material is neutral and sourced properly.

I hope that this helps explain why it was removed! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:29, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]