User talk:Sdanielle16
This user is a student editor in MHS/English_1301_(Fall_2017) . |
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Sdanielle16, and welcome to Wikipedia! My name is Shalor and I work with the Wiki Education Foundation; I help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment.
I hope you enjoy editing here. If you haven't already done so, please check out the student training library, which introduces you to editing and Wikipedia's core principles. You may also want to check out the Teahouse, a community of Wikipedia editors dedicated to helping new users. Below are some resources to help you get started editing.
Handouts
|
---|
Additional Resources
|
|
If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact me on my talk page. Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 19:31, 11 December 2017 (UTC)
December 2017
[edit]Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Illegal immigration to the United States has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: Illegal immigration to the United States was changed by Sdanielle16 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944084 on 2017-12-14T03:49:15+00:00 .
Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:49, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Illegal immigration to the United States
[edit]Hi, I wanted to let you know that your edits to Illegal immigration to the United States were reverted by Natureium because they were unsourced.
All content must be sourced in order to be added to an article, but especially when it comes to articles that are inherently controversial such as this one. (Especially with the current Presidency, which makes it even more controversial.) This particular article is under sanctions, which means that edits will be more closely scrutinized than they would be at most other articles. This means that when it comes to editing this article people need to make especially sure that their edits pass Wikipedia's guidelines on notability, neutrality, and so on. On this note, I must also warn you about tone - the content would not be considered neutral, as it would be seen as opinion statement on Wikipedia due to how it was written. You added this in good faith, however this is kind of an example of how careful you need to be when editing on Wikipedia, to make sure that your material is neutral and sourced properly.
I hope that this helps explain why it was removed! Shalor (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:29, 14 December 2017 (UTC)