User talk:Scully887

November 2009

This is the only warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did to Harland Sanders, you will be blocked from editing. ~~ GB fan ~~ ^talk 22:06, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Willking1979 (talk) 22:43, 29 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scully887 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was blocked for saying that Col. Sanders was still alive. But it's true, he faked his death. So that means I didn't vandalize Wikipedia and should be unblocked.

Decline reason:

No. Jayron32 05:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scully887 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm not Mulder887, I'm his partner.

Decline reason:

No legitimate unblock reason listed. TN X Man 12:51, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

To whoever the admin was that tagged User: JulesWhinfield001 as one of my socks, Thats not me, I got nothing to do with that one.

Scully887 (talk) 04:12, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Scully887 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

The truth is out there

Decline reason:

So is Xenu, but unlike the truth Xenu isn't ephemeral, subjective, and abused. Now slot off, JI Hawkins. -Jeremy ^{(v^_^v Stop... at a WHAMMY!!)} 04:24, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.