User talk:Scrutineer1

Dr Brendan Connolly

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Dr Brendan Connolly, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.thenaturalreligion.org. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.)

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 11:32, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I have blanked the page pending verification of the email you sent, and it should remain blanked until your email is processed. Thank you. VernoWhitney (talk) 17:14, 22 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brendan Connolly

The article Brendan Connolly has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:BIO. This author has received very little attention, one review for his book in ScienceSpin and that seems to be it. Book is apparently selfpublished (or by any means, his book is the only title for that publisher anywhere), which is not a good sign usually.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Fram (talk) 09:58, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I have attempted to improve this article by adding links to the author's broadcast Interviews and book and magazine Reviews.--Scrutineer1 (talk) 10:51, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]