User talk:Screechybird1

Welcome!

Hi Screechybird1! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! KirkburnFandom (talk) 04:50, 15 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

February 2021

Hello, I'm Kirbanzo. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Susan Lontine—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Kirbanzo ^{(userpage - talk - contribs)} 04:56, 16 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

Hi Screechybird1! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Edits to Susan Lontine, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days (usually at least two days, and sometimes four or more). You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please feel free to create a new thread.

The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} here on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 19 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Undoing edits

You undid an edit that I made and indicated it was unsourced. This is not true. You cannot simply undo edits that you do not like if sources are provided.Kmccook (talk) 17:11, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I understand the concern. However, the formatting and sourcing weren't done in a very neat manner. I find that the Ron DeSantis article is quite biased, but consensus has to be established per wikipedia rules.Screechybird1 (talk) 17:19, 6 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]