User talk:Scottmz

Re: talk:69.141.45.90

Well, I am not quite sure if you are agreeing with me or not but I will explain my actions. The line "Paul Johnson is friends with British-Jewish playwright Tom Stoppard, meeting with him for tea and biscuits" does not sound like something that was researched and added to wikipedia for the sake of the encyclopedia, all it sounds like to me is someone made this up. If this was indeed a true fact it would of had a reference, which it did not. My warning was not a "greeting" it was a warning that his edit did not appear to have contributed to wikipedia, it isnt always an instance of vandalism, it is simply an edit that "did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed." I still believe that my actions are justified and do not believe my edit should be reverted. Sirkad_talk 02:58, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hmmm, good question, could you show me the history of the article and where i changed it? Sirkad_talk 03:40, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You are correct, I incorrectly identified your edit as vandalism, I am sorry. Sirkad_talk 18:00, 4 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]