User talk:ScottLantz

User page

Hi Scott, and welcome to Wikipedia. Hope you don't mind - I've made a minor edit to your userpage to remove the reference to you being an administrator here on the English Wikipedia. There's a general opposition to editors claiming user rights they don't currently have, as it leads at best to confusion over the context in which to view their actions.

Let me know if you disagree with this change for any reason, and good luck with your future editing. Euryalus (talk) 02:53, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of PC (soft drink)

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article PC (soft drink), suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

POV, OR, non-notable drink

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 16:34, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of PC (soft drink)

I have nominated PC (soft drink), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/PC (soft drink). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Passportguy (talk) 16:42, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Great Value Root Beer

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Great Value Root Beer, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:POV

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Passportguy (talk) 16:46, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

June 2009

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. Please do not upload pages stating your personal opinions on the taste of various softdrink brands Passportguy (talk) 16:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Great Value Root Beer

A tag has been placed on Great Value Root Beer, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Lәo_(βǃʘʘɱ) 16:47, 9 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of "Our Compliments"

A page you created, Our Compliments, has been tagged for deletion, as it meets one or more of the criteria for speedy deletion; specifically, it is about a real person, group of people, band, club, company, organisation, or web content, but does not indicate why its subject is important or significant.

You are welcome to contribute content which complies with our content policies and any applicable inclusion guidelines. However, please do not simply re-create the page with the same content. You may also wish to read our introduction to editing and guide to writing your first article.

Thank you. Work permit (talk) 06:13, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to the page Our Compliments has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, please ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Work permit (talk) 06:15, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The recent edit you made to Our Compliments constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to remove content from articles without explanation. Thank you. Work permit (talk) 06:16, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to Our Compliments. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Work permit (talk) 06:17, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete the csd tag, use the hangon template and put your reasons on the talk page.--Work permit (talk) 06:18, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to User:Work permit. Work permit (talk) 06:23, 27 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Koenig Competiton 2002

The article Koenig Competiton 2002 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced, notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Falcon8765 (talk) 01:20, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Star Fox: The Movie

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Star Fox: The Movie, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. TheLetterM (talk) 03:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Star Fox: The Movie

The article Star Fox: The Movie has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:CRYSTAL.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Joe Chill (talk) 03:52, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

July 2009

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Ford E-Series, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --04:30, 30 July 2009 (UTC)

Blazemaster

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Blazemaster, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Blazemaster. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:43, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blademaster (Transformers)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Blademaster (Transformers), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://tfwiki.net/wiki/Blademaster. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 04:49, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Blademaster (Transformers)

The article Blademaster (Transformers) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable minor character in the Transformers franchise. Fails Wikipedia:Notability, as the subject has not received significant coverage in reliable secondary sources that are independent of the subject.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. The leftorium 09:49, 18 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of Blademaster (Transformers)

I have nominated Blademaster (Transformers), an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Blademaster (Transformers). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. The leftorium 17:41, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Detritus (Transformers)

The article Detritus (Transformers) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No encyclopaedic content found on this page

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the Proposed Deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The Speedy Deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and Articles for Deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. —S Marshall ^Talk/_Cont 16:51, 13 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Stalker (Transformers)

The article Stalker (Transformers) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No evidence of notability per WP:GNG or specific notability policies.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cnilep (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Lockheed 212

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Lockheed 212, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MilborneOne (talk) 19:48, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Fairchild FC-2L Razorback

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Fairchild FC-2L Razorback, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MilborneOne (talk) 19:50, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Douglas O-2BS

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Douglas O-2BS, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MilborneOne (talk) 19:52, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Avro Wright

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Avro Wright, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MilborneOne (talk) 19:53, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of North American NA-26

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as North American NA-26, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MilborneOne (talk) 19:54, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of North American NA-44

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as North American NA-44, to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MilborneOne (talk) 19:55, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism warning

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. Please do not create any more hoax and nonsense articles. MilborneOne (talk) 20:04, 8 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Waco AQC-6

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Waco AQC-6 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article, which appears to be about a real person, individual animal(s), an organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Manadude2 : Talk 15:15, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Waco PG-2A

A tag has been placed on Waco PG-2A requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for organizations and companies. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. MuffledThud (talk) 15:22, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for creating nonsense pages. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first.

MilborneOne (talk) 15:28, 18 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hurricane (Transformers) for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Hurricane (Transformers), which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hurricane (Transformers) until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Divebomb (talk) 18:00, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rotorstorm for deletion

A discussion has begun about whether the article Rotorstorm, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rotorstorm until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Black Kite (t) (c) 20:08, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Road Pig (Transformers) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Road Pig (Transformers) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Road Pig (Transformers) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Josh Milburn (talk) 22:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]