Jump to content

User talk:ScottDavis/Archive 18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 15Archive 16Archive 17Archive 18Archive 19Archive 20→Archive 22

Your draft article, Draft:United Australia Party (2018)

Hello, ScottDavis. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "United Australia Party".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Mjs1991 (talk) 04:49, 16 August 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – September 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2019).

Administrator changes

added Bradv • Chetsford • Izno
readded Floquenbeam • Lectonar
removed DESiegel • Jake Wartenberg • Rjanag • Topbanana

CheckUser changes

removed Callanecc • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Oversight changes

removed Callanecc • Fox • HJ Mitchell • LFaraone • There'sNoTime

Technical news

  • Editors using the mobile website on Wikipedia can opt-in to new advanced features via your settings page. This will give access to more interface links, special pages, and tools.
  • The advanced version of the edit review pages (recent changes, watchlist, and related changes) now includes two new filters. These filters are for "All contents" and "All discussions". They will filter the view to just those namespaces.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:37, 7 September 2019 (UTC)

Deprodding of Umbrella Entertainment

I have removed the {{proposed deletion/dated}} tag from Umbrella Entertainment, which you proposed for deletion. I'm leaving this message here to notify you about it. If you still think this article should be deleted, please do not add {{proposed deletion}} back to the page. Instead, feel free to list it at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. Thanks! -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:51, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

Hi ScottDavis. This is just a courtesy notification. I didn't de-prod the article; another editor did and they didn't give a reason. If you still feel there are notability issues with the article, you may nominate it for deletion at WP:AFD. -- Marchjuly (talk) 01:07, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
@Marchjuly: I was responding to the issue being raised on WP:AWNB in the first place. As you have noticed, I cleaned up a lot of the WP:COI material and left it for a few hours. When I came back to it, I failed to find evidence of notability so added {{PROD}}. I have left a message on the talk page of the user who removed the PROD, so will give him/her a chance to respond before proceeding to AFD. As you said, if the enterprise is wiki-notable, then the COI edits should be able to be managed. LinkedIn says the Marketing Coordinator is someone with a name that matches several of the contributors to the article, so I'd say she has been zealous in her job. Thanks. --Scott Davis Talk 02:49, 11 September 2019 (UTC)
I didn't notice the AWNB thread until after I posted the above. I actually had more in my OP, but removed the stuff which appeared to be covered in the AWNB thread. As I hinted at in my post at AWNB, even a BADFAITH de-prod is still a de-prod; so, the next step would be AfD for anyone who feels the article fails NORG. I'm leaning that way myself, but also asked about this at WT:FILM#Umbrella Entertainment just to get a little more input. -- Marchjuly (talk) 03:00, 11 September 2019 (UTC)

engvar

it brings things out of the woodwork, and seems as unresolved as totally unexpected arrivals from some who havent been on the awnb page for years, suddenly turn up. I have no interest in it further - it simply feels like other talk page things that go on and on, and there is clearly a sign of individuals who turn up and say i do it this way, and in the end it smells of herding cats... it does not look like a set of individuals who are going to agree to a consensus decision. Maybe they will resolve something, but thats it from me. JarrahTree 12:17, 22 September 2019 (UTC)

I have sent some email recently, do you check them at all? JarrahTree 03:06, 24 September 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – October 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a discussion, a new criterion for speedy category renaming was added: C2F: One eponymous article, which applies if the category contains only an eponymous article or media file, provided that the category has not otherwise been emptied shortly before the nomination. The default outcome is an upmerge to the parent categories.

Technical news

  • As previously noted, tighter password requirements for Administrators were put in place last year. Wikipedia should now alert you if your password is less than 10 characters long and thus too short.

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The Community Tech team has been working on a system for temporarily watching pages, and welcomes feedback.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:55, 2 October 2019 (UTC)

For services to the generation of electricity

Bright Spark Award
Keep up the great work on electricity generation! Kerry (talk) 22:04, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
Thank you Kerry. --Scott Davis Talk 01:54, 11 October 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – November 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2019).

Guideline and policy news

  • A related RfC is seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure.

Arbitration

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:15, 3 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael McInerney

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael McInerney requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

  • disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
  • disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
  • is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. MB 03:25, 12 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

Hopgood

Brings back some memories to see someone adding all that info on Hopgood's PhD for his article - I spent a day poring over it in the SLSA years ago because it's the best source in existence on the Lang Labor Party (South Australia) and then managed to lose all my notes in a hard drive crash before I ever got around putting it into Wikipedia. I wish someone'd digitise the damn thing so I could do it again without a repeat trip to Adelaide. The Drover's Wife (talk) 09:00, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

@The Drover's Wife: Thanks. I was really only looking for enough info to justify correcting his title from Mr. to Dr. when I realised it was wrong. There is probably a lot more good stuff about him in that source. Have you tried asking the State Library to digitise his thesis? I got a "low-res" scan of a document emailed for free (for family history, not Wikipedia). They said they could do "hi-res" for a fee, but since their source was only a 1980s/90s photocopy of an 1860s diary, the low-res scan was as good as their original. --Scott Davis Talk 11:15, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
That's not a bad idea! Do you know where I might ask them? Google wasn't very helpful in that regard. The Drover's Wife (talk) 11:57, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
@The Drover's Wife: Try https://www.slsa.sa.gov.au/ask-us --Scott Davis Talk 12:06, 22 November 2019 (UTC)
Ta! The Drover's Wife (talk) 12:11, 22 November 2019 (UTC)

Google Code-In 2019 is coming - please mentor some documentation tasks!

Hello,

Google Code-In, Google-organized contest in which the Wikimedia Foundation participates, starts in a few weeks. This contest is about taking high school students into the world of opensource. I'm sending you this message because you recently edited a documentation page at the English Wikipedia.

I would like to ask you to take part in Google Code-In as a mentor. That would mean to prepare at least one task (it can be documentation related, or something else - the other categories are Code, Design, Quality Assurance and Outreach) for the participants, and help the student to complete it. Please sign up at the contest page and send us your Google account address to google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org, so we can invite you in!

From my own experience, Google Code-In can be fun, you can make several new friends, attract new people to your wiki and make them part of your community.

If you have any questions, please let us know at google-code-in-admins@lists.wikimedia.org.

Thank you!

--User:Martin Urbanec (talk) 21:58, 23 November 2019 (UTC)

Infobox maps for roadways

Hi. I noticed that you've added OpenStreetMap maps in some articles for roads in Adelaide (i.e. Flagstaff Road, Adelaide). I was wondering how you created the maps and how you added them into the infobox, they look fantastic! – Nick Mitchell 98 talk 08:05, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Hi @Nick Mitchell 98:. The wikidata item must have at least one coordinate location (P625), and a way or relation in OpenStreetMap must have the wikidata and/or wikipedia link set. I don't think the OpenStreetMap relation ID (P402) in Wikidata is needed, but it doesn't hurt. It's possible the infobox has to have coordinates as well. --Scott Davis Talk 12:56, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

kemerton

for anyone with knowledge of the environmental issues that were dominating the media of Perth (as it was then) in the early 1980s, the word kemerton was something like a red rag, interesting that the locality does not even show up in 2010s as even having been a location. The average punter over here wouldnt even be able to distinguish wellesley from worsley is my guess. I suppose it is all a matter of age, memory and areas of interest. JarrahTree 05:32, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Thanks JarrahTree. That suggests there was a lot more I should have found of interest to put in the Kemerton Power Station article. Thank you for what you have added so far. I found the WA electricity articles to be in a pretty poor state compared to the eastern states. I can't even work out how many distinct power stations there are in Kwinana! I was considering sending you a request for a sanity check, but it looks like you have found what I've done so far. Are you able to run your eye over List of power stations in Western Australia and/or {{Energy in Western Australia}} to at least provide a red link with the right name for each (major) power station on the grid please? Power station articles can be technically interesting as the infobox can be filled completely from wikidata. I haven't found any other infoboxes on enwiki that can be done that way yet. --Scott Davis Talk 05:57, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

If you look at my edit history, everything in energy/electricity on wikipedia looks like someone left the door attached to the window sash as in the movie 'on the beach'.... even back to basics the talk pages suggests people lost interest a long time ago... User:Callistemon is well worth contacting either on or off line - he lives near the kwinana area and is former mining in australia content builder extraordinaire... If you are curious about boxes - rangasyd did some good stuff for the dams and things in Tassie. I am probably not into state library until the new year... but will have a look, the big problem is time, it is going crazy at the moment in reallife, I put my hands up for too many things at my age... 06:09, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

BTW buried somewhere in Mines (I used to go to their now hardly ever used library) should be the mineral sands context to Kemerton
The mid 1980s battles over mining bauxite in the darling range (not adequately covered in overview anywhere) had included Kemerton as a potential bauxite processing site, and inneresting is the earlier documents suggest it was in Harvey shire, current material suggests Bunbury... my very local knowledge on Harvey-Bunbury area suggests that there are many unwritten articles that need digging in offline sources materials, that means 2020 for me JarrahTree 06:14, 28 November 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – December 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2019).

Administrator changes

added EvergreenFir • ToBeFree
removed Akhilleus • Athaenara • John Vandenberg • Melchoir • MichaelQSchmidt • NeilN • Youngamerican • 😂

CheckUser changes

readded Beeblebrox
removed Deskana

Interface administrator changes

readded Evad37

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 2 December 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – January 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:07, 4 January 2020 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of solar farms in South Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Adani (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 20 January 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – February 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following a request for comment, partial blocks are now enabled on the English Wikipedia. This functionality allows administrators to block users from editing specific pages or namespaces rather than the entire site. A draft policy is being workshopped at Wikipedia:Partial blocks.
  • The request for comment seeking the community's sentiment for a binding desysop procedure closed with wide-spread support for an alternative desysoping procedure based on community input. No proposed process received consensus.

Technical news

  • Twinkle now supports partial blocking. There is a small checkbox that toggles the "partial" status for both blocks and templating. There is currently one template: {{uw-pblock}}.
  • When trying to move a page, if the target title already exists then a warning message is shown. The warning message will now include a link to the target title. [1]

Arbitration

  • Following a recent arbitration case, the Arbitration Committee reminded administrators that checkuser and oversight blocks must not be reversed or modified without prior consultation with the checkuser or oversighter who placed the block, the respective functionary team, or the Arbitration Committee.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:06, 1 February 2020 (UTC)

peripheral

there is a peripheral issue with some motorsport issues - nothing too much of a promise, but better to protect if you can at some point, as it will be ages before I get there... JarrahTree 14:00, 10 February 2020 (UTC)

@JarrahTree: Yes, I could tell I had stepped into something bigger than I cared to untangle. I hope there is someone who is able to access an appropriate set of third-party sources. --Scott Davis Talk 07:57, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
there are, if watched carefully, some sensible editors who 'watch' motorsport and will edit where necessary - but they have low profile and do not seem to venture anywhere beyond their specific watch list that appears narrow... one of the motorsport watchers may well have the knowledge... but which one, and how to reach out, anyones guess.. JarrahTree 08:46, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

ASC Shipbuilding

Hi, Can you please have a look at the following matter. There is a proposal to delete the above article. While the article in its current form is worthy of deletion, the subject is notable. In particular, its future cash flow will be one of the highest of a company based in South Australia. I have not got the time to fix this article by the scheduled execution date and to the necessary changes to both ASC Pty Ltd, the Osborne Naval Shipyard and several other articles. I have found several federal government reports about the subject background and are looking for some more sources. What can you suggest? Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 09:58, 11 February 2020 (UTC)

@Cowdy001: I'm adding a bit to it, but about to knock off for the night and may not get there by the PROD deadline. Thanks for bringing it to my attention. Anyone can just remove a PROD tag, and make the proposer (and seconder) take it to a full AFD process. I agree that it looks like it is sufficiently distinct from either its former or current parent to be separately documented, although WP:TOOSOON would be a possible argument for deletion/merger. Are you sure that ASC Shipbuilding reverts to ASC Pty Ltd after the Hunter class contract? I couldn't see that in the cited reference. --Scott Davis Talk 14:00, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
@ScottDavis: I found two new sources where the resumption of ownership is mentioned:
BAE Systems beats Spanish and Italian designs for $35 billion warship building program as follows:

ASC Shipbuilding, which is government-owned, will become a subsidiary of BAE during the build… At the end of the building program Australia will resume complete ownership of ASC Shipbuilding, meaning intellectual property of the Australian Type 26 will be retained by the Commonwealth.

Doorstop: Future Frigates Announcement: Osborne Shipyards, South Australia as follows:

SENATOR THE HON. MATHIAS CORMANN, MINISTER FOR FINANCE: ... ASC Shipbuilding will do this as a subsidiary of BAE Systems during the period of the build, with the Commonwealth retaining a sovereign share. That sovereign share gives us certain rights during the build period in relation to any decisions or actions that have national security or other relevant strategic implications. But it also means that, at the end of the build period, the ASC Shipbuilding entity, with the intellectual property, a highly skilled workforce and all of the associated equipment, returns to Commonwealth ownership.

Regards Cowdy001 (talk) 00:18, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Replied at ASC Shipbuilding#Proposed deletion. --Scott Davis Talk 00:56, 12 February 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • Following an RfC, the blocking policy was changed to state that sysops must not undo or alter CheckUser or Oversight blocks, rather than should not.
  • A request for comment confirmed that sandboxes of established but inactive editors may not be blanked due solely to inactivity.

Technical news

  • Following a discussion, Twinkle's default CSD behavior will soon change, most likely this week. After the change, Twinkle will default to "tagging mode" if there is no CSD tag present, and default to "deletion mode" if there is a CSD tag present. You will be able to always default to "deletion mode" (the current behavior) using your Twinkle preferences.

Miscellaneous


Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 11:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)

Adelaide Meetup 22 – Friday 6 March 2020

Riverside Precinct Adelaide Meetup
Next: 6 March 2020
Last: 19 May 2018

WikiProject Adelaide Meetup 22 has been hastily arranged, spread the word!

DATE: Friday 6 March 2020

TIME: 5.00–6.30 pm

VENUE: Cafe Amore, 162-170 Pulteney St, Adelaide

Celebrate the long weekend with a meet-up and discuss what you'd like to see in the world of Wikimedia in 2020. Sign-up and RSVP here.

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Adelaide at 22:16, 5 March 2020 (UTC). You received this message because your user page is in Category:Wikipedians in South Australia. If you do not wish to receive future notifications, please advise Wikipedia talk:Meetup/Adelaide.

Administrators' newsletter – April 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2020).

Guideline and policy news

  • There is an ongoing request for comment to streamline the source deprecation and blacklisting process.

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • The WMF has begun a pilot report of the pages most visited through various social media platforms to help with anti-vandalism and anti-disinformation efforts. The report is updated daily and will be available through the end of May.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 07:00, 1 April 2020 (UTC)

50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week

Hello there. This is an invitation to join the 50,000 Destubbing Challenge Focus of the Week. £250 (c. $310) is being given away in May, June and July with £20 worth of prizes to give away every week for most articles destubbed. Each week there is a different region of focus, including one week dedicated to the top half of Africa, and the last week dedicated to Australia and Oceania though half the prize will still be rewarded for articles on any subject. There's a potential £120 to be won in total for destubbing on any subject or region of your choice. Sign up if you want to contribute at least one of the weeks or support the idea! † Encyclopædius 11:21, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – May 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2020).

Administrator changes

removed Gnangarra • Kaisershatner • Malcolmxl5

CheckUser changes

readded Callanecc

Oversight changes

readded HJ Mitchell

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

Miscellaneous

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 2 May 2020 (UTC)

Merger discussion for Australian Country Party (2004)

An article that you have been involved in editing—Australian Country Party (2004)—has been proposed for merging with another article. If you are interested, please participate in the merger discussion. Thank you. Heyitsstevo (talk) 06:30, 6 May 2020 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2020

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2020).

Administrator changes

added CaptainEek • Creffett • Cwmhiraeth
removed Anna Frodesiak • Buckshot06 • Ronhjones • SQL

CheckUser changes

removed SQL

Guideline and policy news

Arbitration

  • A motion was passed to enact a 500/30 restriction on articles related to the history of Jews and antisemitism in Poland during World War II (1933–45), including the Holocaust in Poland. Article talk pages where disruption occurs may also be managed with the stated restriction.
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:28, 1 June 2020 (UTC)

Fiery Creek

I took a look and I think your Fiery Creek birth is most likely in the Beaufort/Raglan area where there was the Fiery Creek gold rush. See this and this. Kerry (talk) 04:07, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Thank you Kerry. I realised that once I started looking into it too. It looks like my 3xgreat grandparents immigrated to South Australia in 1850, and soon after, went to the Victorian gold rush with his cousin (who had immigrated with his parents ten years earlier) and the cousin's new wife. I think the cousin and his wife may have come and gone a few times but stayed in Victoria as children were born in several goldmining areas and he appears to be buried in Victoria. I am yet to identify his wife's death/burial, but their surviving children seem to have stayed in Victoria too. My 3xgreat grandparents returned to SA in 1854 and took up farming in the same area I grew up in over a century later. --Scott Davis Talk 06:33, 5 June 2020 (UTC)

Ruxton-Ireland connections

Hello Scott,

I am currently looking into my family ancestry, and have always been aware of a Ruxton or two mariages into my family in Galway, Ireland in the 1820s.

I have some infornation here, regarding the Ruxton's legal practice in Galway, but it is vague.

I wonder do you have any more information about the Ruxtons of Galway - I can fill you in much more about hteir activites in Ireland/Galway in the 1820s-80s.

Let me know if you areintersrtd to follow-up.

KInd regards,

David Mahon — Preceding unsigned comment added by 93.107.83.14 (talk) 14:50, 23 June 2020 (UTC)

@93.107.83.14: Hi David. I have no knowledge of Galway or Ruxtons. Sorry. --Scott Davis Talk 13:02, 25 June 2020 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:ScottDavis/Archive_18&oldid=969539109"