User talk:Scott28280

Welcome!

Hello, Scott28280, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, your edit to Britain First does not conform to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV). Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{Help me}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! NeilN ^{talk to me} 21:39, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Britain First

The purpose of the article is to describe the program of the political party, not to prove them wrong. The claim you added to the article is both off-topic and misleading; it's unlikely that it is a part of the party's platform that "the only Genuine British people are the original owners of the land, the Celtic people owned Britannia before Germanic tribes 'English origins' moved to the continent". As mentioned above, see the policy of neutrality. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 07:14, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it is not the purpose of Wikipedia to decide who are the "genuine British people". Yes, Wikipedia has an article about Britain First. That doesn't mean that Wikipedia supports the party. After all, the article covers in detail, for example, the party's harassment of Muslims. That doesn't mean that you can go editorializing in the article - the facts (as referenced using reliable sources) speak for themselves. (After all, Wikipedia also has an article about Adolf Hitler. Would you claim that it means that it supports Nazism and the Holocaust?)
If you know about another article which contains off-topic, only tangentially related material, just tell me; I'll check it and perhaps remove it as well. - Mike Rosoft (talk) 06:48, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]