User talk:Scorpiondollprincess

Welcome!

Hello, Scorpiondollprincess, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! - CrazyRussian talk/email 14:58, 17 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

George Smith

Hello and good day to you, seemingly anoymous person. A sincere thankyou for your vote to keep George Toogood Smith. I am increasingly interested in expanding this article and as soon as this gorgeous weather goes away I will dig out some books and get researching. In the meantime I wonder do you have any knowlege/interest in the subject and could you perhaps help yourself? Thankyou kindly and have a very nice day. Perhaps you would also like to sign in under a differant user-name and illegally cast a second vote. I know I will! (Only kidding, I almost never do that)--Crestville 14:54, 18 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hermitian Forks

I went back and read my comments on the "Hermetism" AfD...they were somewhat more polemic than I had intended. I hope I didn't sway your opinion overly much! I stumbled on an outrageous claim on the actual Hermeticism page, and so I am a little crotchety when it comes to that genre.

But I do think you have it right about the "POVFORK", and the fact that the Hermeticism article is perfectly comprehensive as it is. Byrgenwulf 17:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mini-nuny

Can you please revisit this AFD? I have added a second, similar article from the same source. Same situation: it was incorrectly prod'ed a second time. Fan-1967 19:50, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

AfD: Hilary Cleveland

Hi, I added some to this article that voted for deletion. If you have the time please read the expanded article and reconsider your vote to delete. Perches 01:20, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Verifiable sources"

Just a small note: It is articles that are (or are not) verifiable, i.e. capable of being verified. The attribute of concern when it comes to sources is whether they are reliable. Uncle G 18:43, 10 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Survey

Hi Scorpion!

I have put together a survey for female editors of Wikipedia (and related projects) in order to explore, in greater detail, women's experiences and roles within the Wikimedia movement. It'd be wonderful if you could participate!

It's an independent survey, done by me, as a fellow volunteer Wikimedian. It is not being done on behalf of the Wikimedia Foundation. I hope you'll participate!

Just click this link to participate in this survey, via Google!

Any questions or concerns, feel free to email me or stop by my user talk page. Also, feel free to share this any other female Wikimedians you may know. It is in English, but any language Wikimedia participants are encouraged to participate. I appreciate your contributions - to the survey and to Wikipedia! Thank you! SarahStierch (talk) 03:31, 28 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative

WikiWomen Unite!

Hi Scorpiondollprincess! Women around the world who edit and contribute to Wikipedia are coming together to celebrate each other's work, support one another, and engage new women to also join in on the empowering experience of shaping the sum of all the world's knowledge - through the WikiWomen's Collaborative.

As a WikiWoman, we'd love to have you involved! You can do this by:

Liking the WikiWomen's Collaborative on Facebook and share your tips, projects, and connect with other WikiWomen
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel

We can't wait to have you involved, and feel free to drop by our meta page (under construction) to see how else you can get involved!

Can't wait to have you involved! SarahStierch (talk) 04:56, 9 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

WikiWomen's Collaborative: Come join us (and check out our new website)!

WikiWomen - We need you!

Hi Scorpiondollprincess! The WikiWomen's Collaborative is a group of women from around the world who edit Wikipedia, contribute to its sister projects, and support the mission of free knowledge. We recently updated our website, created new volunteer positions, and more!

Get involved by:

Visiting our website for resources, events, and more
Meet other women and share your story in our profile space
Participate at and "like" our Facebook group
Join the conversation on our Twitter feed
Reading and writing for our blog channel
Volunteer to write for our blog, recruit blog writers, translate content, and co-run our Facebook and receive perks for volunteering
Already participating? Take our survey and share your experience!

Thanks for editing Wikipedia, and we look forward to you being a part of the Collaborative! -- EdwardsBot (talk) 01:10, 10 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]