User talk:Scorpion5567

Welcome!

Hello, Scorpion5567, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions, especially your edits to Meghwal. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Sitush (talk) 08:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Raj sources

Hi, thanks for your edit at Meghwal. Unfortunately, I have had to revert it because we do not generally consider sources from the British Raj era to be reliable. Sorry. - Sitush (talk) 08:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Meghwal has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Meghwal was changed by Scorpion5567 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951409 on 2016-09-15T13:14:14+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:14, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Thank you. TimothyJosephWood 13:15, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Meghwal. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 13:48, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at Meghwal shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the article's talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See BRD for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in your being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you don't violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Linguist 111 If you reply here, please type {{ping|Linguist111}} before your message. 14:21, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Widr (talk) 14:23, 15 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]