User talk:Scoobybay26

Welcome!

Hello, Scoobybay26, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! BracketBot (talk) 20:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

August 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cavemen (Misseri Studio) may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

{{the television show|
{{Infobox television

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 20:22, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Snow White (Disney) because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Materialscientist (talk) 22:11, 27 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Fish Hooks. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Diff: [1] Cyphoidbomb (talk) 22:06, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Freddi Fish has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Freddi Fish was changed by Scoobybay26 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.951444 on 2014-11-26T01:02:43+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at Fish Hooks. Your edits have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. Diffs: 2 edits Cyphoidbomb (talk) 03:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

November 2014

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Freddi Fish has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: Freddi Fish was changed by Scoobybay26 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.876636 on 2014-11-28T17:16:47+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:16, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. We write neutrally, because this is an encyclopedia; we do not, for example, describe characters as "cute" unless independent reliable sources use the term to describe them. Just the facts. This is the main reason your edits today have not been improvements. Calling the anti-vandal bot a "bitch" is not going to help. Read the policy page I linked and if you still feel the description needs to be changed, discuss it on the talk page - with at least one source. Yngvadottir (talk) 17:32, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sesame Street Season 35

Hello Scoobybay26,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Sesame Street Season 35 for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, [[{{{article}}}]].

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. ubiquity (talk) 19:43, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sesame Street Season 35

The article Sesame Street Season 35 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not particularly notable as it stands -- just an undocumented list of places where SSS35 may have been released. There are no articles for earlier seasons, no dates to give context, just seems like listcruft.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ubiquity (talk) 15:46, 2 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sesame Street Seasons 34 & 35 Worldwide Releases

The article Sesame Street Seasons 34 & 35 Worldwide Releases has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not particularly notable as it stands -- just an undocumented list of places where SSS35 may have been released. There are no articles for earlier seasons, no dates to give context, just seems like listcruft.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. – Gilliam (talk) 04:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. A page you recently created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines for new pages, so it will be removed shortly (if it hasn't been already). Please use the sandbox for any tests, and consider using the Article Wizard. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Your first article. You may also want to read our introduction page to learn more about contributing. Thank you. – Gilliam (talk) 04:23, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Julia Chantrey

The article Julia Chantrey has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GLG GLG (talk) 01:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Lauren Lipson

The article Lauren Lipson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GLG GLG (talk) 01:02, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ashley Peters

The article Ashley Peters has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GLG GLG (talk) 01:06, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Katie Bergin

The article Katie Bergin has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GLG GLG (talk) 01:07, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kristi Friday

The article Kristi Friday has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GLG GLG (talk) 01:07, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sarah Podemski

The article Sarah Podemski has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GLG GLG (talk) 01:09, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ian Ronningen

The article Ian Ronningen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GLG GLG (talk) 01:09, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Rochelle Wilson

The article Rochelle Wilson has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. GLG GLG (talk) 01:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of James Wallis (actor)

Hello Scoobybay26,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged James Wallis (actor) for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:09, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Novie Edwards

Hello Scoobybay26,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Novie Edwards for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. TheLongTone (talk) 13:11, 20 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Novie Edwards for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Novie Edwards is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Novie Edwards until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TheLongTone (talk) 14:45, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ian Ronningen

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ian Ronningen requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Wgolf (talk) 22:15, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 14

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ian Ronningen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page All In. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:46, 14 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

January 2016

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Total Drama All-Stars and Pahkitew Island, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. This refers specifically to your insertion of what you claim are the nationalities of particular characters on the show. Unless it is officially verified by the show's producers, Fresh TV or Teletoon, what you put in the article is fan speculation and that has no place on Wikipedia. Creativity-II (talk) 05:49, 29 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ian Ronningen

The article Ian Ronningen has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Wgolf (talk) 23:11, 19 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 20

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Ian Ronningen, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Duncan. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 20 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

August 2016

Hello, I'm KylieTastic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Hanover have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think a mistake was made, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. KylieTastic (talk) 16:22, 21 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Hanover, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Denniss (talk) 15:43, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

September 2016

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:Denniss. BilCat (talk) 03:35, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Scoobybay26. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ian Ronningen

The article Ian Ronningen has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

subject fail to meet the relevant notability guideline WP:ENT

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kingstoken (talk) 23:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your incorrect information about (singer) Kathy Linden

Your name -- Scoobybay26 -- is listed as having made two separate changes to the (singer) Kathy Linden article. If that was not the case, please let know.

First you stated that Kathy was born in Brooklyn, NY. That is NOT TRUE.

Then you stated that Kathy was born in Atlanta, GA. That is NOT TRUE.

I have no idea where you got that information. I am not sure if you stated a source somewhere but if that is the case then your source is TOTALLY WRONG.

I know Kathy personally and I interviewed her a few years ago.

Here is that interview. Please go to 3:15 in the interview where I stated that she was born in New Jersey and she agreed with me.

http://www.jerseygirlssing.com/Ronnie%20Allen%20Show%20--%20Kathy%20Linden.mp3

kathy did not state what town in New Jersey that she was born in. I am going to be talking to her again soon and I will ask her and, if she tells me and I get her permission, I will add it to the article.

I care very much about information on Wikipedia about people that I know personally be ACCURATE.

Though you do not have to tell me, I would be very interested in knowing the sources that made you decide to add Brooklyn and then replace it with Atlanta, both totally incorrect. If that incorrect information is "out there" I would like to contact those people responsible and let them know the correct information.

I have modified the article by removing her place of birth.

Thank you for your attention to this matter.

72.78.81.104 (talk) 21:23, 10 November 2017 (UTC)Ronnie — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.78.81.104 (talk) 02:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Scoobybay26. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

February 2018

Hello, I'm SummerPhDv2.0. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Wonderful Tonight, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 01:44, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Edna McGriff, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 22:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

March 2018

This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User talk:SummerPhDv2.0, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. ‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Border Town ‖ 07:45, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|Your reason here}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

You've been warned before about unconstructive editing. Threatening and attacking editors is not acceptable. Please convince us that your future at Wikipedia will be different, and you might be unblocked. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 08:13, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent posts here

You are blocked. You are not permitted to use this page to suggest edits for others to make.

If you wish to be unblocked, please read what is written above. Thank you. Anna Frodesiak (talk) 00:31, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page access revoked

Your ability to edit your talk page has been revoked. If you wish to be unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then submit a request at UTRS. Thank you, Anna Frodesiak (talk) 22:04, 21 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]