User talk:Scondilo

Your contributions to the Andrea Bocelli article weren't helpful. Next time please add to the article, instead of removing other peoples contributions based on your judgement alone.

Funny you say that because you are doing just that in your message. I gave reasons for all my changes. You gave none. I think you just don't like my edits but you have to respect them.

Well you are the one who started editing, and removing major parts of this article which I desagree with. All I did was restore everything the way it was which i believe is the better version. I wrote most of this article and been improving it for many years, i also created many of the pages that are related to this article, including all Bocelli's albums. The My Christmas article I've worked on for a long time and it is now almost as long as the Bocelli article. So you can understand when someone out of no where starts errasing all the edits that I've wasted along time doing, finding the sources, etc. Everything in the intro, or at least most of it was fine, especialy his total albums sales, the record that Bocelli holds in the US, and his popularity in a recent pull in the UK. After your editing, these infos aren't in the article anymore since I only wrote them in the Intro. The other thing is the Album section in the article I don't understand your problem with it, there is nothing wrong with adding the best placements of each album worldwide, most other artist articles have them and it gives a summary for those who dont wanna look in the chart placement of every single album page. Now lets discust this instead of threatening each other. In the mean time I hope you'll undue your edits if you see what i mean, or else explain to me in what way you disagree.

PS: I wanted to give reason to my edits but there wasn't enough space to give them and write what I wrote at the same time.

I have undone the changes you made to the discography section because I believe it is appropriate to have the chart placements. Please do not remove them again without a valid reason. As for your other changes, they look fine. This should end the dispute between you and Ahmad123987. I will send them a similar message indicating the same. Please do not reengage in edit warring. You have now been warned multiple times.--Tonalone (talk) 07:10, 18 January 2010 (UTC)

You seriously have a problem with Bocelli, or else you would have never made all the edits you have made, I don't have a problem with any of them except for changing Bocelli from high to low importance! Maybe if you have changed it to mid, which is still low considering how big he is in the world today, I would have thought it was perhaps acceptable, but to not only change it to low, but also remove him from the opera portal! Who the hell do you think you are? I edited those 2 changes, and suggest you don't touch them again. It's obvious to me you are an opera purist who doesn't like Bocelli and only wishes to diminish his achievements. Ahmad123987 (talk) 12:15, 30 January 2010 (UTC)

January 2010

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Andrea Bocelli. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period. Additionally, users who perform several reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. When in dispute with another editor you should first try to discuss controversial changes to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. Should that prove unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. Please stop the disruption, otherwise you may be blocked from editing. BaronLarf 03:29, 18 January 2010 (UTC)