User talk:Sckay27

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC) CANT STOP WONT STOP your pictures suck btw[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Hobey Baker, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Hobey Baker was changed by Sckay27 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.957438 on 2014-01-15T03:32:45+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 03:32, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 03:34, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

{0.2em 0.4em;">Kuru]] (talk) 03:46, 15 January 2014 (UTC)}}[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sckay27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

CANT STOP WONT STOP

Decline reason:

Well, at least you're honest. - Vianello (Talk) 04:18, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I REMOVED THE BLBOCK REVIEW POST IM APEALING AGIAN AND AGAIN AND AGIAN AND AGIAN I HAVE A VANDILIZSM PROBLUM

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sckay27 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

if you block me i will find another computer make a new scout and continue to block again and again until wikipedia falls apart and deletes its self just to get me out of its head Sckay27 (talk) 10:18 pm, Today (UTC−6)

Decline reason:

That'll take up vastly more of your time than of any of ours. Go right ahead. - Vianello (Talk) 04:19, 15 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.