User talk:ScissorsEzra

January 2011

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Eggplant, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted (undone) by ClueBot NG.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Eggplant was changed by ScissorsEzra (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.878493 on 2011-01-14T11:40:17+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 11:40, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

My source is correct. Mr. Johnson himself. Undo the correction please regards

SE

Reviewer request

Hi. I just responded to your "edit request" on the Reviewer request page. That wasn't the right way to process the request, but I don't think it matters much, anyway. First, your account is too new to get reviewer status; second, there's no such thing as reviewer status on a single article; and third, I don't think you are requesting the right thing, anyway. If all you want to be able to do is edit pages that are WP:Semi-protected, then simply continuing to make productive edits for the next few days will enable you do to so. A reviewer is someone who reviews the edits of new or anonymous edits on a certain small subset of pages to make sure that they aren't vandalism. If you have any questions about this or anything else on Wikipedia, please feel free to post here or on my talk page. Qwyrxian (talk) 12:38, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Dwayne Johnson. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Bento00 (talk) 00:16, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unreferenced controversial biographical content to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at Dwayne Johnson. Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —Ute in DC (talk) 08:45, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Account blocked

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Gogo Dodo (talk) 08:57, 18 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Dwayne Johnson, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bento00 (talk) 21:06, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Dwayne Johnson

Re your message: Your word is not sufficient and is not acceptable. All biographical information must be properly sourced. If you add in the same information without a proper source again, I will block you again, this time indefinitely. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 21:59, 19 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

let me add to that Gogo. it doesn't matter what your alleged relationship with Johnson is. Trying to insert stuff because you're a fan and supposedly a good friend makes you tread closer to WP:COI. Honestly, I think you're nothing but a fanboy.--Eaglestorm (talk) 23:29, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Whisperback

Hello. You have a new message at Bento00's talk page.

Dwayne Johnson edits

Hi there. I have removed your addition to the above page, as I feel that it is not well enough sourced to be included in a page about a living person. IMDB is generally considered a poor source for Wikipedia articles, as it is a user-edited resource: basically, anyone can make changes to it. I hunted around for other information regarding the engagement you've edited on, and found nothing other than mirrors of Wikipedia, which I found odd; generally, any news regarding a big star being engaged will be reported on in at least a tabloid or something similar. (And in this case, in the wrestling online media, which is also silent.) I have started a section on Talk:Dwayne Johnson where I explained this edit as well; I encourage you to participate there if you have other, better reliable sources that back up your information. Thanks. Tony Fox (arf!) 17:41, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

well I've been welcomed to edit the page by Bento00 which I asked before posting to make sure my edit was correct.

JM

ScissorsEzra, yes, you are welcome to edit a page and source your edits, but editors have the right to deny the source, as Tony Fox did above. Please see WP:SOURCE, WP:RS, and WP:BURDEN. Bento00 (talk) 18:16, 3 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]