User talk:Sci-fiGOD2k7
June 2007
[edit]
Welcome, and thank you for experimenting with the page Shrek on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Poindexter Propellerhead 00:47, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to John the Baptist, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Ccrashh 12:02, 27 June 2007 (UTC)
Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Sci-fiGOD2k7! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule example\.com, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links guidelines for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 22:27, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Notability of Ashley Bailey
[edit]A tag has been placed on Ashley Bailey, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag) and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. P4k 22:36, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
July 2007
[edit]
Please stop. If you continue to ignore our policies by introducing inappropriate pages, such as The legacy of Alex, to Wikipedia, you will be blocked. Slp1 22:49, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although we invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to List of fictional doctors, was not constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Slp1 22:55, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Wikipedia, you will be blocked from editing. Dr bab 23:15, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
Why cant i write about my novels, this is a constructive question and i just want an answer please, i mean no offence.
- All articles on Wikipedia must meet the notability criteria decided upon by the wikipedia community. According to these criteria, unpublished novels are not notable. Please check the notability criteria before creating any more articles. Dr bab 23:24, 2 July 2007 (UTC).
- I am sorry if you are upset that you do a lot of work that is deleted, but consider this: If every unpublished author created articles about his or her unpublished novels, wikipedia would very soon contain a vast amount of articles on subjects that have no meaning to anyone except the individual unpublished authors. The idea behind the notability criteria is that wikipedia is not about everything. If you manage to get you novels published and reviewed, it might be appropriate to include articles on them, but not before then. Good luck on your writing. Dr bab 23:31, 2 July 2007 (UTC).
IrishGuy talk 23:33, 2 July 2007 (UTC)
i see thank you for your advice
Speedy deletion of *The butcher
[edit]A tag has been placed on *The butcher requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pyrospirit (talk · contribs) 20:29, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
- If you really think that more needs to be said about this, charcter, add it to List of Silent Hill monsters or Silent Hill: Origins, -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 07:05, 7 January 2008 (UTC)