User talk:Schottsi

Welcome!

Hello, Schottsi, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as The Game, Terry Schott, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Everymorning talk to me 03:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Game, Terry Schott

The article The Game, Terry Schott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication of meeting WP:NBOOK, no coverage that I could find in reliable independent sources.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Everymorning talk to me 03:07, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Interlude-Brandon

Hello, Schottsi. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Interlude-Brandon, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. William2001 (talk) 03:34, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Digital Heretic

Hello, Schottsi. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Digital Heretic, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. William2001 (talk) 03:37, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Game, Terry Schott for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Game, Terry Schott is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Game, Terry Schott until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 03:52, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Game is Life for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Game is Life is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Game is Life until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 03:56, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Virtual Prophet) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Virtual Prophet, Schottsi!

Wikipedia editor Jersey92 just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Nominated for deletion

To reply, leave a comment on Jersey92's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Speedy delete nomination

Speedy deletion nomination of Virtual Prophet

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Virtual Prophet, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which articles can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may be soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Jersey92 (talk) 04:30, 19 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability for books

I'm writing because your books just don't pass notability guidelines. I'm sorry, but I can't see where your work has received coverage in independent and reliable sources that would be considered RS by Wikipedia. By this I mean coverage in newspapers and the like. I also noted that you've said that you created these pages for your fans, since they were asking for them. It's just that we can't keep a page because it could be useful (WP:ITSUSEFUL) for your fanbase. As a whole I'd recommend that you look into creating something at Wikia, as they don't require the strict standards that Wikipedia wants and you can write whatever you want there. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 04:56, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]