User talk:Scholar911

Scholar911, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Scholar911! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like GreenMeansGo (talk).

Visit the Teahouse

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:04, 16 November 2018 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: IndraStra Global (April 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Randykitty was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

To meet our inclusion criteria (see WP:GNG or WP:NORG), you need reliable sources that are independent of the subject and discuss it in depth. Listings in library catalogs and non-selective databases, and in-passing mentions don't contribute to notability, nor is notability inherited because notable authors have published with IndraStra.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:IndraStra Global and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:IndraStra Global, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Randykitty (talk) 09:40, 20 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of IndraStra Global Open Repository

The article IndraStra Global Open Repository has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable database, from a company whose article was rejected in draft-space

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DMacks (talk) 02:49, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of IndraStra Global Open Repository for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article IndraStra Global Open Repository is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/IndraStra Global Open Repository until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Randykitty (talk) 09:55, 30 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amrita Jash for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amrita Jash is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amrita Jash (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DMacks (talk) 03:34, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Amrita Jash, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chinese (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:49, 31 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kirin Narayan at AfD

Hello there. I saw your nomination of this article at AfD. I was rather surprised - can you offer some clarification there? I also wanted to suggest a couple of things when taking something to AfD. One is, please don't mark adding an AfD template as a 'minor' edit - it is a significant step in the life (or end of) an article, and best done as a normal edit. Also, though certainly not required, it can be a good idea to leave a message on the talk pages of the article's main contributors (if there are any), to let them know about the AfD. In this article, there are two main contributors visible in the article history - myself and Big Iron. I have left a note for Big Iron. Cheers, hamiltonstone (talk) 13:40, 6 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

July 2019

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. Yunshui ^雲 _水 10:06, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]