User talk:Schoenhg

Hello, I am a new user. Feedback is welcome, thank you! Schoenhg (talk) 14:18, 16 April 2013 (UTC)

Schoenhg, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Schoenhg! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Rosiestep (I'm a Teahouse host) Visit the Teahouse This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:16, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Fecal coliforms vs coliforms

I have undone the edit introduced by IP 129.2.129.16 in the Wikipedia article entitled "Fecal coliform" which excluded Enterobacter from the list of non-fecal origin bacteria. The argument for this exclusion was a statement made by an on line document, found at the URL http://depts.alverno.edu/nsmt/archive/UnruhDuelge.htm (authors Duelge and Unruh), which classified Enterobacter as a fecal coliform. This document, which cites the journal article "Brion Gail, Mao, Huazhong. 2002. Use of Total Coliform Test for Watershed Monitoring with Respect to Atypicals. Journal of Environmental Engineering, 126: 175-181." as the source of this statement, is not a peer-reviewed information source (it actually looks like a report generated by two students as part of a course they were taking - no offense intended!). Unfortunately I cannot retrieve the publication by Brion and Mao (no journal subscription) to verify the accuracy of the document written by Duelge and Unruh. I can, however, verify that in order to be classified as a fecal coliform, a bacterial strain must fit into the coliform classification AND it must also be able to ferment lactose with gas production in up to 48 hours at a temperature of 44.5°C (please also see Wikipedia article on Enterobacter). Because Enterobacter cannot fulfill this second criterion, it cannot be classified as a fecal coliform. The reason for exclusion of Enterobacter from the list (within the Wikipedia article entitled "Fecal coliform") is therefore not a valid one in my opinion.

If you disagree, please feel free to comment here, but please back up your argument with verifiable, trusted sources of information :) Schoenhg (talk) 12:51, 12 June 2013 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Add sources Erythema Gram-negative bacteria Trichothecene Ochratoxin Virulence factor Metastrongylosis Cleanup Iron bacteria Umu Chromotest Cinoxacin Expand Core oligosaccharide Scyllatoxin Escherichia coli Unencyclopaedic Beetlejuice (TV series) Quinolone Psoriasis

Wikify Margatoxin Extracellular adenylate cyclase Myiasis Orphan Alpha-D-phosphohexomutase superfamily Lipopolysaccharide kinase (Kdo/WaaP) family Wound bed preparation Merge Cord factor Amoebiasis Trichuris trichiura Stub Clostridium enterotoxin Enterobacter cloacae Cardiotoxin III Coliform bacteria Streptolysin Septal panniculitis

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 09:36, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rexinoid concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rexinoid, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:10, 8 January 2014 (UTC)

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rexinoid

Hello Schoenhg. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Rexinoid".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Rexinoid}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. —Anne Delong (talk) 22:56, 4 February 2014 (UTC)